Columbine shooting
This story is about some kids that went in to a school and killed people with machine guns. This school is currently the most popular high school in the worlds. There were 12 students and 1 teacher killed. They killed a girl named Rachel that was a senior and she was such a nice girl she started a chain reaction that is all over the world. The kids that killed Rachel killed themselves at the scene. The question is, should parents of the kids that killed the students be responsible for the kid’s doings and should they go to prison?
Should parents be responsible for their kid’s doings? The parents did not kill anyone so they can’t be charged with murder. There is no proof of convincing the kids to kill anyone or anything like that. There was only one reason they even knew about it and that was that there was a bomb in the parent’s closet. So why they can charge the parents with anything? Parents can’t control their kid’s life, it’s the kids that make the choices. The parents can try to stop them, but they can’t most likely stop them without hurting them. When a child makes a mistake the parents shouldn’t be charged. It’s just like when a man kills someone they can’t charge …show more content…
He should have had a cop meet them there and he should have asked the kids what they were doing with the guns. It’s not the guy that sold the guns business be he should have followed the kids and been more curious about them. The question is who is most responsible. The guy that sold the guns should have been more curious but it’s not his business. The parents only have one thing to do with it that was that there was a bomb that was in his closet of the parent’s room. They asked him why it was in there and he said he found it in his son’s room and he didn’t know what to do with it. Off of the evidence it looks like the guy that sold the guns was more responsible than the
This story is about some kids that went in to a school and killed people with machine guns. This school is currently the most popular high school in the worlds. There were 12 students and 1 teacher killed. They killed a girl named Rachel that was a senior and she was such a nice girl she started a chain reaction that is all over the world. The kids that killed Rachel killed themselves at the scene. The question is, should parents of the kids that killed the students be responsible for the kid’s doings and should they go to prison?
Should parents be responsible for their kid’s doings? The parents did not kill anyone so they can’t be charged with murder. There is no proof of convincing the kids to kill anyone or anything like that. There was only one reason they even knew about it and that was that there was a bomb in the parent’s closet. So why they can charge the parents with anything? Parents can’t control their kid’s life, it’s the kids that make the choices. The parents can try to stop them, but they can’t most likely stop them without hurting them. When a child makes a mistake the parents shouldn’t be charged. It’s just like when a man kills someone they can’t charge …show more content…
He should have had a cop meet them there and he should have asked the kids what they were doing with the guns. It’s not the guy that sold the guns business be he should have followed the kids and been more curious about them. The question is who is most responsible. The guy that sold the guns should have been more curious but it’s not his business. The parents only have one thing to do with it that was that there was a bomb that was in his closet of the parent’s room. They asked him why it was in there and he said he found it in his son’s room and he didn’t know what to do with it. Off of the evidence it looks like the guy that sold the guns was more responsible than the