Persuasive Essay On Cloning Pets

Improved Essays
Cloning pets, or animals in general, is a controversial topic. However controversial it is, it is still waste of useful money and is generally cruel in nature. While others may root for the advancement in technology, it is not worth the suffering and distress that follows, especially regarding health defects and the surrogate mother. Should we really risk all of that for cloning your pet?

Cloning your pet is extremely expensive. According to the article, “Paying $100,000 to Clone Your Dog Won’t Give You Your Dog Back,” it costs $100,000 to personally clone your pet. The Humane Society of the United States says that $100,000 is a waste of good money, and could have been used towards helping other animal welfare groups. While you may miss your beloved pet, there is always the option to adopt a new pet. Believe it or not, you may very well find companionship in a pet awaiting a better life than in the shelter. Besides, adopting a dog or cat from your local shelter costs $100 at maximum, and $50-60 at the very least; that’s $99,900 less than what it’d cost to clone your pet!
…show more content…
Health issues are common, regardless of how experienced the performing scientist may be. Some examples of health issues are birth deformities and a decreased lifespan. As stated in an article by the NCBI, “Cloning May Cause Health Defects,” there have been many cases of cloned sheep, cows, and mice dying shortly after birth. There has also been cases where, even if it didn’t die soon after, the animal would still have other defects. According to the same passage, it states that “the calf’s lymphoid tissues—the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes—had failed to develop normally. ” Would you still pay $100,000 if there were chances of your pet dying or falling terribly ill after being

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dollie the sheep was the first mammal to be cloned by an adult cell by using the process of nuclear transfer. This process started by a cell is placed in a de-nucleated egg, the two cells fuse and then develop into an embryo. Dollie was cloned at the Roslin Institute in 1997. The idea was developed from part of a research in producing the milk from farm animals.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is another way in which this case was seen as beneficial, however it is perceived as slightly minor in regards to the other benefits. This application of cloning does not relate to dogs only, but to all animals which can be considered to be pets. Many who have mourned the loss of a pet have ‘brought it back to life’ through reproductive cloning. While this may seem a little extreme, this scientific breakthrough has made it possible for these pet owners to feel connected to their deceased pets once again. Cloning therefore has many merits and can prove to be utilitarian…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They could also turn out to be unfounded. Lastly, they could get heart and lung defects. Scientists should stop cloning animals because they could possibly give the animal defects. If an endangered species is being cloned, the scientists might think it will save the animals, but it can also give them organ defects. Another thing is that animal clones age faster.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Have you ever thought how many failed attempts can happen when trying to clone your dead pet? It takes thousands of attempts just to clone your little poodle. Many People may have different opinions about having their pets cloned. The choice of cloning your pets is clearly up to you but, I personally don't think that cloning pets should be allowed. The reason why I think cloning pets is unethical is because cloning pets can cause harm to the carrier, it is also very expensive, and can cause health problems.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever thought of how the world would be if scientists were able to bring extinct animals back to life? In 2003, a team of Spanish and French scientists brought an extinct animal back to life just to see it become extinct again. Even though the animal became extinct again, it shows that it is possible to resurrect an extinct animal. De-extinction is possible but humanity’s understanding of it will grow in the future. When we think of de-extinction or resurrection, we think that scientists are actually going to bring back an extinct animal not cloning it.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many religious and conservation organizations find therapeutic cloning unacceptable and unethical, the process can be very rewarding for curing diseases that are otherwise untreatable. Every ten…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simon Smith stated, “Theories exist about how cloning may lead to a cure for heart attacks, a revolution in cosmetic surgery, organs for organ transplantation, and predictions abound about how cloning technology will save thousands of lives.” Therapeutic cloning will bring medical breakthroughs that we’ve never had before. Many adults aren’t able to have children and cloning will give them another option of having their own child. Also, cloning will be able to save animals from extinction and possibly bring back animals that are extinct.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article Bringing Them Back to Life by Carl Zimmer, scientists are debating on whether they should bring back extinct animals or not. Some say that it would be cool to actually “de-extinct” an animal, but is it really worth the time and money to do so? Cloning can involve several different processes such as injecting nuclei into other animal cells, restructuring genomes and reprogramming cells. Bringing back or cloning animals from the past would be great scientific achievement but then again the past is the past and should maybe left that way. There is great debate of de-extinction; the pros of scientific advancement and preservation or the cons of playing God and wasting money.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My first reason they should not resurrect extinct species is that it's very expensive. They spend so much money on trying to resurrect extinct species when there is a very low survival rate. Clones usually have respiratory problems. They have cloned a Pyrenean Ibex but it had a collapsed lung and only lived about 10 minutes. They spent so much money to have it die in 10 minutes.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Certain areas in life must be left alone. One of these is cloning. Because humans are imperfect, playing God and creating life will result in a disaster. Though scientists argue that the costs of cloning are only a few embryos, their curiosity will never be quenched, and further studies, further darkness, will be sought. Because of these reasons, cloning should be banned and eradicated from our minds.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning, cloning, cloning, it seems as if that is the only thing people people talk about nowadays. Is it really worth our money and attention ? Due the rumor that flows throughout the nation, we have been notified of the new bill that just came across in the U.S Senate in which it states that taxpayer money should fund both types of cloning research, reproductive and therapeutic for all animals, including humans. Before taxpayers agree to this bill, it is very important for all people to be aware of the difference between both types. Reproductive cloning is the creation of a whole new organism being a cat, sheep, dog, or even a human.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop Animal Experimentation! When you go to the store and pick up a beauty product, what do you see? Most people would see models and tv ads, but you know what i see? I see helpless, innocent animals, locked in cages, being victims to the testing of the corrosive, toxic chemicals that are used to make beauty products. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane to most people and the only reason why other people turn their back to helping these animals is because they do not truly understand what happens behind those testing lab doors.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cost Of Cloning Pets

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the end, we know that cloning isn’t the right thing to do and there are other ways to get over our grief. Cloning may be the normal in the future, but for now we should reach out and get other pets. Just imagine how many pounds are filled with dogs waiting for you. As we’ve learned the cloning of pets has so many more negatives than positives, so now you should know what to do if your pet dies. Cloning pets is expensive, unethical, and might cause pain to your pets, don't do…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning has been a very controversial topic since research first started looking into the possibilities it could bring to the medical field. With the many different beliefs of how life was created many people think it is wrong for a human to create life no matter what the situation is. Yet the scientific community has many different opinions on the entire matter of cloning because their research is created for the advancement of the greater good of the people.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Owning A Pet Essay

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By owning a pet, you are not just benefiting yourself, but also the well being of the animal. Whether you adopt, buy, or rescue, you are likely saving an animals life. Owning a pet prevents the ability of it not ending up in a shelter or becoming a…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays