The environment is the main point everyone should be focused on. Sure, the money is nice and having more people is great, but what's the worth of those aspects if everything around is slowly falling apart. With this solution it replenishes all of the animals whilst doing it in a way that won't further damage the environment.By letting nature do its course the way it does best it not only helps all of the endangered animals it also helps the seaweed and phytoplankton. The way it does that …show more content…
For starters, unlike C it doesn't bring in possibly invasive species into our town. Another reason it is better than c is that as well as the cost of jobs it costs the people of bayview .10 extra cents per gallon. The average car take 12 gallons to be filled. When you add that with the average cost of gas it adds up to the whopping total of 25.20. That is as much as 4 Big Mac Meals at Mcdonalds! Now solution B isn't something to wink at either. Clearly something is wrong and if you do nothing to fix it then it will force the already declining environment to only get worse! With this solution you will have plenty more tourism and a fresh environment without the risks of the other solution.
This solution not only greatly improves Bayview it can set an example for many other oceanside towns and encourage them to fix their on bay. If you want to see bayview actually have a view at our bay you should vote for this solution for guaranteed