Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Decent Essays
Most animal experiments aren’t even relevant to human health and are only conducted out of curiosity.
Many don’t even pretend to hold promise for curing any illness.
We already do drug tests on people. No matter how many animals are tested someone is always the first human to be tested on.
Animal tests are incredibly unreliable.
The FDA has proved that 92% of all drugs that are tested and shown safe and effective on animals fail on human trials.
Of the small percentage that do work half are relabeled because of side effects not revealed in animal tests.
Testing on an animal shows almost no correlation to the effect on humans.
Penicillin kills guinea pigs but is inactive in rabbits.
Aspirin kills cats and causes birth defects in rats, mice,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Maybe one day technology will have advanced so far as to render animal testing unnecessary, which would be ideal, but that day is simply not today. However we must not be wanton or ruthless in our testing of animals, just as animal test subjects are necessary so are the ethical and moral policies that regulate animal testing. Scientific advancement should never rely on what is blatantly cruel and scientists should always strive to do as little harm or cause as little distress as possible to their test subjects. Animal testing can lead to great advancements in medical technology and it is our job to make sure that we take the comfort and well being of the animals being tested into account. After all, to anthropomorphize for a moment, isn’t that the least we can do for the beings who are helping us treat all the diseases we are susceptible…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The polio vaccine was tested on animal before being mass distributed to humans during the polio epidemic. The vaccine reduced the 350,000 cases in 1988, to only 223 cases of polio in 2012. Also, the use of chimpanzees for test, lead to the discovery of the Hepatitis B vaccine. 2.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I. Introduction a. There is an estimated 115 million animals used for research in laboratories every year. The precise number is unknown because so few countries actually collect data about every animal they use for testing and research. II. Narration a. Animal testing is the use of any non-human animal in an experiment. It has become more prevalent in the past few decades due to advancements in the medical and scientific fields.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, many debates have been sparked about the use of animals in experiments to test the quality and effects of different drugs and treatments. This is an understandably controversial topic as the ethical treatment of these animals is often questioned. Many believe that animal testing should be prohibited, but would this really be to the benefit of scientific advancement? Animal testing is necessary for scientific development and this essay aims to support this statement by providing relevant evidence to outweigh the opinions that animal testing is no longer necessary. Animal testing is necessary as scientists need to determine the effect of a drug on a whole living system (AnimalResearch.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals should not be tested for barbering products because testing is cruel treatment to animals. Michele McKay states that “Animals endure chemicals being dripped into their eyes, injected into their bodies, forced up their nostrils or forced down their throats” (1). According to the article chemicals are put in there eyes which can cause them to become blind, injections can have dangerous side effects and the force feeding makes animals eat or digest things they usually would never eat. Animals go through it all in laboratories its like an animal jail but not only are they locked and poorly fed but even tortured to the point of death. The People of Ethical treatment for animals state that “The animals’ suffering begins even before they reach the vivisectors’ hands when they are ripped from their families and forced to live in bleak conditions” (1).…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States alone, over one hundred million vulnerable animals are inhumanely killed each year during unnecessary scientific experimentations (peta.org). Testing on innocent and defenseless animals is a revolting act that needs to be terminated. Pain and suffering are the only sensations many of these animals experience during the last moments of their diminutive lives (Garner). Scientists have claimed that any pain that animals feel during experiments are “necessary”, nevertheless, they do not consider how suffering would be far more acknowledged if humans were the test subjects (Garner). Important to realize, is that animal testing is an unreliable and wasteful source of research.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Banned

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animals aren’t exactly the same as humans so they most likely not to work . 94% many of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These tests have actually been considered unnecessary because the treatments found have often come out unsuccessful, according to FDA, “92 percent of drugs that pass animal tests, fail to proceed to the market” (U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)). This shows how the suffering animals are put through to help improve the lives of humans isn’t all that productive. The Animal Welfare Act only creates the impression that animals do have basic protection but there is no moral justification when it comes to animal…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well the fact is that whether we use animals or not, there will always be a first person to test a new drug. The FDA has noted that 92% of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. Out of that 8% that pass the human trial, half of them will need to be re- labeled because of side effects that showed in the human test, but not the animal. III. There was a paper published in the British medical Journal titled " Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?"…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    · The results may not always be valid. § Though some animals have extremely similar biological compositions as humans, they are still different. Some products that have been tested in animals may come out being useless when it comes to working on humans. Accordingly, Vittana.com states, “The FDA estimated that 92% of drugs that pass their pre-clinical tests, including animal research, fail to reach the market. Recent data suggest that failure rates from animal research to human research could be even higher, at 96%, according to the NIH.”…

    • 2233 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is proof that you can’t assume that drugs that passed animal tests can be used safely in humans. Animal testing should not be used to find medications that are helpful to humans because drugs that are helpful to animals could be harmful to humans and drugs that are helpful to humans could be harmful to animals. The animal Welfare Act has not succeeded in preventing many cases of animal abuse in research labs. The Humane Society of the United States has undergone a nine month investigation that revealed that the New Iberia Research Center (NIRC) were abusing 100s of chimpanzees.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientists have established that various animals have related physical processes as humans. While observing how a new drug affects on an animal makes it more probable to figure out how the new drug would distress the human body Animal testing saved many human lives. It would be completely wrong to test new types of drugs on the human body. Many people would die because doctors would not know many things about the new drug including, the affects of the new drug. Animal testing not only has the power to save…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Facts

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal Testing “Ninety-two percent of experimental drugs that are safe and effective on animals fail in human clinical trials because they don’t work or are dangerous” (“Animal Experimentation Facts”). This statistic shows animal testing is too inaccurate to be used and animals are not the same as humans. Even though animals are much different than humans, there are people who think testing drugs on the animals the right thing. When a scientist is testing a new drug they will inject the animals; such as rats, fish, monkeys, etc.; with diseases they wouldn’t naturally get and then giving them the certain drug they are testing for. When scientists are testing new cosmetic products one of the things they would do is shave the skin and rub a substances…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, animal testing is a reason for why effective treatments are obscure while dangerous ones are spreading among the humans [2]. As in the past few years, there have been different incidences. One of them is the Vioxx drug a drug that has been successful in curing arthritis in different species of animals including monkeys yet caused Harte attacks, strokes and death to humankind [2]. Another story happened one year ago were a drug trial in France concluded by killing one volunteer while leaving the others with a severe brain injury [2]. This tragedy is one of the countless others.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The drugs Oraflex, Selacryn, Zomax, Suprol and Meritol produced such adverse side effects in humans, including death, that they were removed from the market, though animal experimentation had predicted them all to be safe. One of the few studies that examined the differences in species reactions found only a 5-25% connection between harmful effects in people and the results of animal experiments (MFAT). Also these animals are in an unnatural environment, where they will be under stress. Therefore, they won't react to the drugs in the same way compared to their potential reaction in a natural environment. This argument further weakens the validity of animal experimentation.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays