Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Animals are tested on for human products all of the time. Some products that are tested on animals are Vaseline, Iams pet food, Mars candy, Windex, makeup and even cures for human diseases. This is animal abuse and it can hurt them badly or even kill them, it’s not promising that the product will work for a human if it works on an animal. How would you like to be a tester for animal products?. Sure people might say they are just animals and there are so many of them so why not use them for testing, but sometimes the product doesn’t even work so why test it on a sweet animal when you could save a living organism by testing it on something else. According to https://www.dosomething.org/us/facts/11-facts-about-animal-testing “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year”. But why? There are so many more better alternatives for example, in vitro (test tube) test methods and models based on human cell and tissue cultures, computerized patient-drug databases and virtual drug trials, computer models and simulations, stem cell and genetic testing methods. That could help save the lives of poor animals that are being tested on. Also these deaths of …show more content…
If the product is meant for a human, trying it on an animal doesn’t mean it will work on a human. So why test them on an animal then? So many people ask that. https://www.dosomething.org/us/facts/11-facts-about-animal-testing says “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.” Aren’t they dangerous to an animal too? Animals have lives too and we should take that into account. Last but not least Animal tests may mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Maybe one day technology will have advanced so far as to render animal testing unnecessary, which would be ideal, but that day is simply not today. However we must not be wanton or ruthless in our testing of animals, just as animal test subjects are necessary so are the ethical and moral policies that regulate animal testing. Scientific advancement should never rely on what is blatantly cruel and scientists should always strive to do as little harm or cause as little distress as possible to their test subjects. Animal testing can lead to great advancements in medical technology and it is our job to make sure that we take the comfort and well being of the animals being tested into account. After all, to anthropomorphize for a moment, isn’t that the least we can do for the beings who are helping us treat all the diseases we are susceptible…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main reason is because animals are biologically different from humans. For example, a mouse can produce Vitamin C on it’s own, they have no gall bladder, and can not throw up, therefore, they should not be one of the most commonly used animals for testing products. There are many cases in which there are various studies showing the effect of a certain cancer but then it does not cause cancer in an animal when tested. This is due to them having a different anatomy and makeup. As everyone learns growing up, everyone reacts differently to various chemicals.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Testing on animals is also a lot more expensive and non-practical than alternative methods. (Animals In). “Some people, including some scientists object to the practice strictly on ethical and moral grounds, refuting or rejecting any scientific evidence that animal testing is helpful to humans.” (Judson 12). However, groups opposing the cruel treatment of animals were influential in getting regulations passed to protect welfare of animals.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If something does not work on an animal they do not even try it on a human (Dawn ch. 6). This means that money is wasted on the tests and animals are killed for tests that are not even considered for humans. If a test does not work on an animal, it could still potentially work on a human, but because it did not pass the rat test, humans do not even have a chance with it. Animal testing is ineffective. Animals are not exactly like humans and their skin reacts to chemicals differently (“About” 4).…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, plenty of these companies that test on animals claim to do it because there are requirement laws for it in other countries that they sell to (“About Cosmetic Testing”); if this is the case then these companies shouldn 't sell to those countries till new laws are passed. So on, there is no necessity to use animals for cosmetics testing, making it unethical and cruel to the animals. There should be more laws on testing on animals in the basis of cosmetics, but separate from…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reprieve Animal Testing

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With so many other options available animals should not be used or hurt in experiments. Looking at the results of animal testing clearly shows that animals are poor test subjects because of the lack of comparison between them and…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The testing on animals is a very touchy subject. It makes people wonder whether or not its cruel to advance technology by killing innocent animals. Killing animals for testing has its benefits but it's still inhumane to do that to animals. It can destroy populations of animals if tested often and if every lab has its own supply of animals the populations will drop by extreme numbers. The animals that are tested on often get terrible treatment as the people testing on them know they will soon die.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal testing is no longer effective in today’s society. Testing has no purpose, it has been said many a time that it is useless and unnecessary. There is a higher chance of flipping a coin and being accurate in a test than actually doing the research and testing on animals. To see if a new product is safe it goes through a whole process where animals are being mistreated for the benefits of humans. Animals in experiments today are bred for the sole purpose of the particular experiment, so once the experiment ends, the animals have no value, and end up getting euthanized, because they are useless to scientists.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Animal Testing Worth

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are many good reasons for this. One being a quote from Jeremy Bentham, an english philosopher, who once said “The question is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk. But can they suffer?” This is very important because testing new products on animals is dangerous, the outcome on whether it will be successful or not is never really certain. If companies stopped testing their products on animals they could be sparing the lives of innocent animals and they could even get…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The tests can be unreliable. Millions of dollars are wasted every year on conducting research on animals. “The US Government spends around $10 billion of taxpayers' money each year on animal-based research […].” (Fox) Not only that, but like said before, there are alternatives to animal testing. Some of these tests create better outcomes, like artificial human skin.…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Orlans). Additionally, some that survive the testings are permanently injured. So, why do we keep testing on animals when there are other alternatives to test products? If we put all our resources to find other alternatives, then we can stop this cruel act groups such as Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) are already protesting against this problem, so should everybody else. No product is worth killing millions of animals.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main reason why we animal test is for cosmetic research, not medical research, which is the only type that can be half accepted. Medical research for humans on animals means they still do not get the correct results we need because of the two different reactions of chemicals in two different animals. Popular brands hide the way they animal test because they know that when people find out their product will not sell as well. Global warming is also a huge and rising problem on our earth, and by cutting out cosmetic research on animals, it will mean a few hundred less factories running around the world and releasing fumes into the atmosphere. This will mean a lot of jobs lost, but there are plenty more jobs in the world and it will only benefit our world.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although animal experimentation has provided many benefits, there are alternatives to test toxic substances that may eliminate the cruel use of animals in research. The United States, along with many other countries, have turned to the use of animals in research labs to test human products for hazardous substances. According to the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, the United States uses about 12 million animals every year making it the biggest conductor of animal experimentation in the world. Scientists and many companies believe that testing their products on animals save humans from being harmed if the product is toxic. However, no matter what the benefits of animal experimentation are, the tests conducted on the animals are cruel.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned Everyday innocent animals are being forced into labs and tested for human research advancement. Cruelty Free International states how approximately 115 million animals, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, mice, dogs and monkeys are used in dangerous laboratory experiments every year. In fact, many of the experiments are said to be useless tests, as stated, “The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable” (“Animal Testing is Bad Science”). Misconceptions by the media may stretch the idea how animal testing can cure diseases, illnesses etc.. But actually, as emphasized, animal testing is an inefficient way of finding medical advances, making the procedures to be unnecessary and making there be no reason to force animals into labs without a choice, it's blatantly a waste of animals lives.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alternative methods exist and can be used in place of animals, and these alternative methods can also be a cheaper option. Animals and humans are entirely different, so the use of animals doesn’t even provide accuracy, so even if a product passes an animal test, it doesn’t even mean it’s entirely safe. Nearly 95% of animals being used in various experiments are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. A large majority of experiments run on animals are flawed and often don’t produce a concise result, making them a waste of time and lives. Animals suffer the same as humans, so it’s blatant speciesism to use them for experiments over willing…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays