It could 100% truly be because, well they are not humans, but if they are not humans, then why are we testing them ? That is the same question I ask myself. Human and animal genetics are very different, making these tests very inefficient and incorrect. They are so poor results, that about 92 percent of successful tests on animals are failed by humans. This fail rate is so high, now just why would they continue wasting money on time on a animal test that will be failed by a human. It is very inefficient and money-consuming as there are also alternative techniques to do the same tests on more efficient, or human like
It could 100% truly be because, well they are not humans, but if they are not humans, then why are we testing them ? That is the same question I ask myself. Human and animal genetics are very different, making these tests very inefficient and incorrect. They are so poor results, that about 92 percent of successful tests on animals are failed by humans. This fail rate is so high, now just why would they continue wasting money on time on a animal test that will be failed by a human. It is very inefficient and money-consuming as there are also alternative techniques to do the same tests on more efficient, or human like