Persuasive Essay Of Banning Books In Public Schools

Improved Essays
How would you feel if you were told that you couldn’t read something because others your age weren’t mature enough to read it? You’d be upset, right? The school board wants to do something similar, they want to ban books that “aren’t suitable” for young readers, just because they think that most middle schoolers aren’t mature enough to read about sensitive subjects. I believe that books with sensitive topics should not be banned from public school libraries, because it should be up to the students’ parents what they are and aren’t allowed to read, kids should be permitted to learn about specific topics beyond the classroom, and lastly, the school board shouldn’t be the ones deciding whether young students are mature enough to read about certain issues. …show more content…
They are stereotyping middle schoolers, saying that all of them are immature and incapable of reading or comprehending more advanced literature. Many middle schoolers are very advanced in language arts and it should be in their reach to check out books that match their reading level. Certain books that are considered to be beyond the comprehension of middle schoolers actually inspire creativity in their writing or other studies. They shouldn’t be denied the privilege of reading great, eye-opening books.

Secondly, the school board is mainly wanting to ban books with racial content in them. Students start to learn about racial discrimination from a young age, teachers emphasize on the fact that slavery is and was wrong. So if a racial slur or insult is written in a book then most students would probably know that it is wrong. Kids want to be more informed on issues that did happen in history. It makes it seem as if the school board is trying to hide the past from them, by not letting them read and explore more about new topics studied in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As Marcus Tullius Cicero, a Roman philosopher, once said, "A room without books is like a body without a soul.” Books have the capability to be any person's escape from reality and no book should ever be subjected to the term "banned". Every book has at least one good thing to offer, no matter how great or small. All the reader has to do is give the book a chance and find that one thing. The novel The Catcher in the Rye, by J.D. Salinger, is one such book that should be taught in high school.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some ideas even being absurd of irrelevant. Then, if the book is determined to be ban, it will no longer be available in some schools or in certain age groups. So, due to one person or group being offended, they believe its ok for it to ban from everyone else? The banned book that I chose to read was “Holes” by Louis Sachar.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reasons For Banning Books

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Novels may contain coarse language or racial themes, and many more topics and have been banned because of these ideas. Simply having offensive content is not a valid reason to ban a book. More classics such as Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, or Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian have faced bans for, according to Beery, “…exploring racial themes or depicting racism directed at various groups of people.” Racism and prejudice exist in the real world, obviously, and exposing children to these themes shows them reality, which helps them differentiate between fantasy and reality.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a few areas a great book, To Kill a Mockingbird, and many books like it are being banned. To Kill a Mockingbird is a very informative book on what life was like in the 1930’s, but it is still being banned for strong language, “strong content”, and strong cases of racism. Many schools have had kids read that book, but because of recent events a few have started to ban it. Some people believe that they can teach messages like the ones taught from this book, but in a better way, so they make it more suitable for kids to read. Some citizens feel that kids should be introduced to strong topics like this when they are in around 8th grade, which is a very common time for schools to have children/teens to read this novel in school, because kids need to be prepared for the real world early on.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether a book should be read in high schools is decided on by many different reason. There are a lot of reasons why books are banned from being read in schools. Things like the mention of witchcraft, sexual acts, or homosexuality can be reasons of throwing a book out of Being read in schools. The Rangers apprentice is a book about a boy who is training to be a ranger. It would be a good book to read in high schools because it teaches good morales and many other good lessons.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book Banning is Misguided. Book banning refers to the restriction of access to a book through assertion of processes initiated by a ruling organization or individual. Targeted books mostly those in schools, libraries or book stores are challenged by individuals in any particular society due to kind of content illustrated in them. Generally, the content is normally categorized as immoral by the challengers who believe that the said content can pollute or adversely influence a young readers mind.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, the question asks, “is there ever a place in a representative democracy for suppression of works based on prescribed ideas/ideology?” Knowing me and how I feel and have argued about potentially banning books in the past, one would think my answer would be a simple yes. My answer is a simple one though it is not yes. When asked if governments should be able to ban a book, and that is what the question is asking, if a government should be able to ban a book based purely on ideology my response is a clear and resounding NO !…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The book I chose for banned book week is To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. This book was published on July 11th, 1960. Harper Lee claims that this book is not autobiographical, but says there are many similarities between the story and her life. Her father was a lawyer as was Scout, who is the main character of the story. Harper said she was also a tomboy growing up similar to how Scout acts in the novel.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, banning books takes away freedom of speech. As the First Amendment states , “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” This is exactly what school boards do when they ban books. They are taking away what us Americans can say and express to others in words or in any sort of media. If we into a country not following these rights pre-set then this story, summarized by Tim Allen (a writer who as wrote many articles for…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the banning of books is wrong. Yes, the book may have a controversial or offensive content, but the books can have good themes. Some about growing up and about the troubles we have to go through while growing up. Books can also teach us about past events, like wars, they can also teach us how people were treated back then. Like stated before, certain books can teach us what growing up is like.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People ban books if its inappropriate, racist, or sexual, but what they dont know is that a book would been a great way to teach a child. I believe these bad books can teach children the consequences of the inappropriate things in the book, and can teach them how to make the right choices. It would be a lot more educating if the child is able to make the right choice in a book, to know if it is bad or good for them. Even though these books that were banned can be very educating the child’s parents stand in their way. That is because parents have the right to decide what their child is allowed to read.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the American Library Association 11,300 books have been challenged since 1982. The school board has banned many books for no reason. The novel The House on Mango Street is an example of one of these many banned books. The TUSD board banned this book because it “promotes the overthrow of the US government, promotes resentment to a race or class of people, and is designed primarily for one ethnic group.” Clearly you can tell that the school board banned this book without doing their research, because it never talked about the overthrow of the government.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fortunately, for every group pushing for bans on literature, there are organizations that fight for this freedom. One such organization is the American Civil Liberties Union. In the year 2000, when discussing the topic of book banning, the organization stated that, “Permitting restraints on literature sets the stage for attacks on all expression that is artistically or politically controversial or that portrays unpleasant realities of life” (American Civil Liberties Union). Although some books may contain graphic violence or sexual content, and therefore of course should be kept out of the hands of children, I’d like to think that these widespread en masse bans of such literature are a poor way to go about it. It’s not as if middle or high school students are incapable of understanding and comprehending dark or more adult subject matter.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Author of The Perks of Being a Wallflower, Stephen Chbosky, shared his views on the act of banning books with the following statement: “Banning books gives us silence when we need speech. It closes our ears when we need to listen. It makes us blind when we need sight” (“A Quote by Stephen Chbosky”). Challenging books usually comes from trying to protect people, mainly students, from “inappropriate” material found in the book. This can effect teachers by making them lose their flexibility to teach of teaching subjects to their students (“About Banned & Challenged Books”).…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Ban or not to ban books? That is the question Should people be able to ban books because they think that the situations are to complex for younger children or to “inappropriate?”Should books be banned because kids are too young to understand things?Should books be allowed to be banned because an adult will think its to harsh about reality, or that the past is too horrific?Some people believe books in schools and libraries should not be banned because they are important parts of our history and 1st amendment right. Books should not be banned in schools and libraries because kids need to learn the controversial topics of yesterday.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays