Persuasive Essay: Do Guns Kill People?

Improved Essays
Professor and Class,
Who would have perceived that this week's discussion would have almost synchronized with yet another terrorist attack? We often heard the National Rifle Association and gun Manufacturers monotonously stated that guns do not kill anyone, people does. The Framers never envisioned that these types of guns come into existence, or else they would have stipulated in the Constitution the type of guns citizens needed to bear. It was over 300 years ago; Look how far we came, from bow-an-arrow to assault rifles. Yes we can change to these types of rifles, but we cannot tweak “The Second Amendment” to keep up with terrorist and modern day criminals? My 25 year old daughter told me that the Constitution need to be amended on the type of guns that citizens bear. But, as soon as anyone mentioned about the "The Second Amendment" the next words that followed, is this Oh, they want to take away our guns. No one wants to take away guns, but who need high powered weapons to do hunting. How many shots do you need to take to hunt for your food or play sports? People with mental health issues also commit atrocities with guns. There need to have some form change with
…show more content…
Are they not one of the Super-packs who make big contributions to Lobbyist and Lawmakers? In my opinion, majority of Americans do have high powered rifles not for fun, but out of fear. They know why they are fearful because of what many of their predecessors had done in the past. If anyone thinks that a ban on these types of weapons is not going to take place, think again. I really do not care about anyone's sexual orientation, but this population is very well hated in society, and because of this they find a social community who will accept them for who they are. From what I have come to learn about the LGBT population, they have nothing but love in their hearts. It is “He” that have made us and not we

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The second amendment gives us the right to own guns and those rights should not be infringed upon. There are many ways to stop the mass shootings from happening, but having a no gun zone is not one of them. We should look at what the people want protection from a sign or protection from a gun. Mass shootings are happening a lot these days and most of them happen in a no gun zone. People with their CCW have stopped mass shootings, how many gun signs have stopped mass shootings?…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout civilization’s history there have been a diverse number of weapons designed to inflict physical and psychological harm with the ultimate goal of implementing its use for personal protection or conquest. Consequently as the utilization and acquisition of innovative weapons becomes less complex, the controversial recognition among society associated with innovative weaponry’s unsafety continues to ascend. Such is the case in the United States, the utilization and improper allocation of firearms has gone through intense scrutiny in recent years due to the growing insecurity these firearms supposedly represent for the American public. The documentary Gunned Down-The Power of the N.R.A. conveys a passionate message from two interest groups…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm. Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on the 2nd Amendment, Americans have the right to own guns for protection and recreation. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted on December 15, 1791 (“Assault Weapons”). The interpretation of the the 2nd Amendment -”the right to bear arms” -is constantly being scrutinized. In the 1950’s as survey reported that “at least one firearm has remained fairly constant at just under…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those startling numbers should make people mindful of that it is so perilous to have a gun where their kids can get it. Likewise, there have been numerous contentions about the Second Amendment where it says, "A well regulated militia...the right of the people to keep and bear arms. " People in favor of guns say that it is their entitlement to claim and convey a weapon. In spite of the fact that the Second Amendment express "the privilege to keep and carry weapons," it is taken outside of any relevant connection to the issue at hand, forgetting the imperative part around a very much controlled local army. The Second Amendment expresses that it is a good fit for the state army to have weapons, not…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyday atrocities occur, and everyday people apathetically watch them happen possessing nothing but blank, empty stares. People are murdered, wars are fought, countries are stricken with poverty, diseases run rampant ending countless lives, and the list goes on and on and, as a people, we are too numb for the magnitude of these misfortunes to even register in our minds. When the average man is sitting on his couch and accidentally flips the channel to the news and sees that thousands died in a bombing overseas, he might experience a brief moment of concern for those that lost their lives and those who lost loved ones in the bombing, but he will soon accept it as a fact of life and the thought of the families ripped apart by the bombing is…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is not the answer More gun control laws are not the answer to less gun violence, better education is what's needed. Gun control has been a much debated topic in the U.S today. It is people's opinions on whether or not to have less or more gun control laws. There are many important reasons why we need more gun control laws but their are many facts about gun related deaths.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I also believe that their should be a form of a psychoanalytical test that each applicant should go through. This test allows for the United States to document the mental health of certain individuals. By instating these acts, receiving a weapon will become more difficult for criminals and citizens in…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass shootings are the worst possible scenario of gun violence; it results in numerous injuries and deaths. The perpetrators of these crimes are commonly assumed to suffer from a mental illness. History has shown that some shooters have had mental illness, but the majority of those criminals do not. The guns used to commit these crimes are often assault weapons that carry an unnecessary amount of ammunition. A limitation of the type and amount of ammunition will dramatically reduce potential damage of future…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control laws and lower gun ownership rates do not prevent suicides nor mass shootings. “Lithuania has one of the world’s lowest gun ownership rate(0.7 guns per 100 people) but its suicide rate (by any method) was 45.06 per 100,000 people in 1999, the highest suicide rate among 71 countries with available information”(ProCon). A background check should be performed on everyone that owns a firearm. If one is not mentally stable they should not be able to posses a firearm. Many people are concerned with mass shootings that occur within the United States.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By Federal law gaining legal access to a gun is a process simpler than a refinancing a family home in the United States. Our government states that under federal law a licensed gun dealer cannot sell any handguns and/or ammo to anyone that is under 21 and can’t sell long arms (Shot guns/ rifles) to anyone under the age of 18 but an unlicensed dealer cannot sell handguns to anyone under 18 and can sell long arms to anyone regardless of age. Everyday there are up to nine deaths under the age of 21 daily, leaving us with an issue that has been here for such a long time but has been continuously ignored and overlooked because most people go about finding solutions for guns in extreme ways. It’s not about getting rid of guns but controlling how…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You just dropped your kid off for school around 8 in the morning. You tell your child “I love you” and send him into school. When pulling out of the school parking lot u see a suspicious van pull into the school, you don't do anything and keep going on your way. Then 30 minutes later you get a phone call from the police……. To be continued.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns should be banned because they are too violent, without them the world would be more peaceful, and crime rates would decrease. This society gun is the best thing for us to have in this world to protect yourself from someone harm us, and our family as well. Have you wondering if the guns were banned we wouldn’t worry about people threaten us and stealing our stuff from our house because they don’t have power to harmed people, without weapon they become weaker also less violence and less crime also death as well and that is good for our society to stay safe and peaceful. Guns are too violent for the whole world especially for the teenager because teens are more emotionally effect than grown up people also Teenager get more influencing…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to a study published in 2012, the number of gun-related murders committed is at its lowest rate since 1981, even with an increased amount of people owning firearms (Gun Rhetoric, 2012). On the opposite side of the spectrum, those that support stricter gun control policies argue that the Second Amendment does not provide an unlimited right to own guns (US Supreme Court). Proponents of more gun control laws state that the Second Amendment is as dated as The Constitution and that it was intended only for militia . Nowhere in the Second Amendment is it explicitly stated that it was created to protect an individual’s right to bear arms (Waldman,…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays