While the War on Drugs has helped reduce illicit drug use to some degree, our government should surrender in the War on Drugs as the progress has been brutally insignificant, the consequences have heavily outweighed the benefits, and theres are many other solutions that are considerably more effective and far less abrasive to communities.
Our government should surrender in the War on Drugs as the progress has been brutally insignificant
As the progress of the War on Drugs
Quote #1: "Nowadays the UN Office on Drugs and Crime no longer talks about a drug-free world. Its boast is that the drug market has “stabilized”, meaning that more than 200m people, or almost 5% of the world's adult population, still take illegal drugs—roughly the same proportion …show more content…
But this ignores the most fundamental of market forces, supply and demand.” (source) Unfortunately, a factor that is not taken into consideration is a concept most predominately seen in business. When the supply of a high demand product is diminished, the price therefore increases. This may dissuade potential customers for most products, but not for drugs.“The drugs market is not price-sensitive. Drugs will be consumed no matter what they cost. So the effect is to encourage production of more drugs and recruitment of more traffickers, which increases availability.” (source) The United States military has aimed to eradicated drug production operations across national boarders in an effort to evade lucrative illicit drug smuggling into the North American states. A common analogy used by drug policy analysts to describe this pattern is referred to as the “Balloon Effect”. When one end of a balloon is squeezed, air is forced to the other side. Similarly, an adverse affect of drug operations being eliminated is that clamping down on drug production and trafficking in one area will inevitably moves operations into another region or
Our government should surrender in the War on Drugs as the progress has been brutally insignificant
As the progress of the War on Drugs
Quote #1: "Nowadays the UN Office on Drugs and Crime no longer talks about a drug-free world. Its boast is that the drug market has “stabilized”, meaning that more than 200m people, or almost 5% of the world's adult population, still take illegal drugs—roughly the same proportion …show more content…
But this ignores the most fundamental of market forces, supply and demand.” (source) Unfortunately, a factor that is not taken into consideration is a concept most predominately seen in business. When the supply of a high demand product is diminished, the price therefore increases. This may dissuade potential customers for most products, but not for drugs.“The drugs market is not price-sensitive. Drugs will be consumed no matter what they cost. So the effect is to encourage production of more drugs and recruitment of more traffickers, which increases availability.” (source) The United States military has aimed to eradicated drug production operations across national boarders in an effort to evade lucrative illicit drug smuggling into the North American states. A common analogy used by drug policy analysts to describe this pattern is referred to as the “Balloon Effect”. When one end of a balloon is squeezed, air is forced to the other side. Similarly, an adverse affect of drug operations being eliminated is that clamping down on drug production and trafficking in one area will inevitably moves operations into another region or