Register to read the introduction…
Due to recent events, one idea has come to the fore: With radical Muslims killing our troops everywhere they can find them, it is clear we need a stronger force. It is true that we can utilize one of the many powerful weapons in our arsenal, such as the nuclear bomb, yet the civilian and biological affects of this are not worth it. It is clear; we should increase the size of our infantry. And it is fortunate we have this surplus of people lying around, literally. Experts tell us that tourists who see these homeless people lying around our cities find the to be demoralizing and therefore reduce the amount they spend. Is it therefore fair to say the homeless are lowering the amount of taxpayer's profits? And why should the taxpayer feel sorry for these people? Does it actually look like they are doing anything to change the situation they have put themselves in? A recent survey indicated that 70% of homeless people had run away from home due to family problems. My friends, this is more than 2/3 of the homeless! I therefore state my solution, which
…show more content…
Of course it is not fair. Therefore, I propose that it is not in our intention to provide these new soldiers with a wage, but rather make them fight for the huge backlog of taxes they have not paid. I grant that the homeless probably will not conform to the high standards that the world expects of our armed forces, and therefore we intend not to spend any more money than we have too. We will therefore create a new division for these men, known as the "Angry Mob". The sole intension of this group is to be deployed into the country, transported to an area of enemy activity, and then be released. We will train them to run around, shooting enemy positions etc. Enemy positions, how to locate them and how to identify the enemy will be included in the training. I believe it is unimportant to train them in tactical moves and why should we spend additional money?
So, why should my proposal be taken into action? Firstly, it will greatly reduce the number of homeless people found in our streets. It will mean that we can give better services back to the taxpayer, and they will therefore agree with my
Of course it is not fair. Therefore, I propose that it is not in our intention to provide these new soldiers with a wage, but rather make them fight for the huge backlog of taxes they have not paid. I grant that the homeless probably will not conform to the high standards that the world expects of our armed forces, and therefore we intend not to spend any more money than we have too. We will therefore create a new division for these men, known as the "Angry Mob". The sole intension of this group is to be deployed into the country, transported to an area of enemy activity, and then be released. We will train them to run around, shooting enemy positions etc. Enemy positions, how to locate them and how to identify the enemy will be included in the training. I believe it is unimportant to train them in tactical moves and why should we spend additional money?
So, why should my proposal be taken into action? Firstly, it will greatly reduce the number of homeless people found in our streets. It will mean that we can give better services back to the taxpayer, and they will therefore agree with my