I think students should have at least a 3.0, but not a 3.5. There are many reasons why, mainly because it is unfair for the students. For example, if a student who has a 3.28, but is really good at basketball, would you turn him down? Probably not. What if the student has below a 3.5 but is taking lots of AP classes. He should still be considered a very smart student and can be included in extracurricular activities. In some cases, there needs to be a 3.5 or above rule, but there has to be some exceptions. To become a good school, students have to be very smart, and the ones who are not, has to be talented at something other than academics. With this rule, students won’t have a fair chance for express what they are good at, and if they are
