Eric Olson On Personhood

Superior Essays
Personhood
Eric Olson, E. Jonathan Lowe, and Lynn Rudder Baker each has different accounts for what a person is. In this paper, I will talk about their points of view on personhood and compare and contrast their ideas while talking about my own account on personhood.
Olson believes that we are all animal. As a result a person is matter that has mental features. Matter is a physical substance that has mass and occupies space, as distinct from immaterial substance like mind and spirit. Mental features are the ability to think, reason, feel, and similar, though Olson doesn’t specify which mental features are only for person. Also, an animal is a living organism, and in the case of human person, a human person is an animal that has special mental
…show more content…
A simple substance is a substance that can’t be divided, in other words, it is a substance that has no substantial part. Lowe argues that a self/person is a unique subject of experiences and mental states. Firstly, he claims that mental states are necessarily had by a subject, like I feel pain so the feeling of pain is necessarily associated with my body, and my body is contingently mine though he didn’t explain why. Secondly, since the mental features require a substance to individuate, or unify, them, and, in this case, the subject, or person, own the mental features, then a person is a substance. Lastly, a self, or a person, does not have any substantial part, which mean it can’t be divided, because if a self is created by different parts, each part will have different experiences, yet the self experiences as a whole. As a result, a self is a simple substance. Also, Lowe claims a human person is created by two entities, one is an animal body and the other is the simple substance that embodies the animal body. Moreover, in the animalist argument of Olson, Lowe will probably rejects the second premise which says that the human animal sitting in your chair is thinking. For thinking is mental feature is necessarily had by person, no animal can …show more content…
Then Martians, computers, or anything that can be conscious about its own consciousness can be consider a person. Self-consciousness is distinct for human. A dog has its consciousness since it has its desires and beliefs, yet, unlike human, it can’t have conscious experience of their thoughts and attitudes. Also, Baker thinks that a human person is constituted by human animal when it has self-consciousness. Constitution is the relation between entity and the material that entity is made of, like a bunch of clay (material), if being used rightly, can constitute a statue (entity). Also, Baker will reject the second premise of Olson’s argument for animalism that says human animal can think. However, not in the same sense as Lowe, Baker rejects this premise because even though she believes that even animal has the ability to think, only person has the first-person perspective, which mean one can be aware of one’s own consciousness. In this case, a human animal alone doesn’t have the ability of self-consciousness so a person cannot be an animal. Baker’s and Lowe’s views on personhood are similar since both of them agree on the idea of constitution of the human body from animal and a human person has two entity, a human animal body and a person. In contrast to both Lowe’s and Baker’s view, Olson believes that human person has only one entity and it is animal. Nevertheless, their views are different on the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Kohn believes that these forms of representation can also be applicable beyond the human, to animals and plants. Ergo, it is because of this symbolic identification that non-humans are also able to obtain the notion of…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Perry’s A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality, Perry discusses both the possibility of immortality (the ability to survive after death) and the question of personal identity. In the process, he proposes three theories as to what could account for personal identity: soul theory, memory theory, and body theory. First, however, it is necessary to discuss what the question of personal identity is. Personal identity refers to a human being’s numerical identity over time. Thus, the question of personal identity essentially asks what must be preserved in order for a person to be considered the same, or continuous, over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “An Argument for Animalism” by Eric T. Olson, he concludes that personal identity is psychological continuity. I will disagree with Olson’s ideas about personal identity in the brain-transplant and the thinking-animal argument. The main point of the paper is about animalism. Olson’s argument is that each one of us is numerically identical to a human animal. Olson says that a person could exist who is not numerically identical to any animal, but it’s not the case for you and I. Olson, then presents his ‘Thinking-Animal Argument’ and the alternatives to that.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will define and describe the mind body problem, defend the position of property dualism, support my claim through the problem of personal identity and the problem of interaction, and provide one refute using epiphenomenalism. The mind-body problem the question of how our consciousness is created through the interaction of mental and brain states. The best way to describe the interaction between mental and brain states is through property dualism. A supporting argument for property dualism is through the problem of personal identity. Through the problem of interacting, property dualism is further strengthened as an accurate way to describe the mind-body problem.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis of Philosophical Arguments of Self-Identity Who or what is the essence of “you”? What is the difference of your mind versus your body; are they the same or entirely different entities? The answers can have significant meanings for the legal and ethical system, not to mention personal beliefs. The views of Thomas Locke and David Humes will be explored in this paper Thomas Locke wrote immensely about this subject. He set out to describe who “self” is and relate that in a manner which is easily understood.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal Identity Concept

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Human beings, as individuals, place a substantial amount of importance on and extensively value the consideration that we are unique. This is foundational aspect of human nature, interaction, and being. But what does this uniqueness mean, and what does it mean to us? The concept of the self or having a personal identity leads to questions of what one is really addressing when making statements about the self; such as, how is the concept of the self created or formed? Does the self persist through time, and how can we know that this identity is the same as we flow through time?…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein, the character Victor Frankenstein is very interested into philosophy which brought his desire to bring death to life. As Victor worked to his maximum energy to create a human he soon realized he's done. However, when the creature came to life victor was shocked but fearful of what he has done. Then Victor deserted his creature who then lived a stressful and isolated life. The opinion of whether the creature is human or not is very straightforward.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most puzzling questions is “what does it mean to be human?” The definition of human is “ A member of the primate genus Homo, especially a member of the species Homo sapiens, distinguished from other apes by a large brain and the capacity for speech”("human"). The definition should also include “thoughts, intelligentes, are self-aware and have emotions”, because humans are complex and unique animals. All though Humans are very similar to chimps, “sharing 98 percent of our genes and many behaviors”, humans stand out due to their level of complex thoughts (Hsu). Some animals share characteristics with humans, such as social groups and communication, but humans take things to an unmatched level.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people believe that personal identity and consciousness is what makes people unique and human. From the objection, there is no concrete explanation to why the resulting individual could be composed of both consciousness’s. With the knowledge and understanding of the branch line case, I believe that Parfit’s argument is a more convincing. Parfit discussed that the replica is neither bodily or physically connected. From Parfit’s perspective, I believe that no one can identify what the result would conclude.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many things that differentiate man from animals: man can create laws and associations, man rationalize the danger in a situation, man reason the intentions of someone. None of these, or any others similar to them, would be possible without conceptual thought. By reducing the mind to the brain and its activities, the two materialistic theories (monism and moderate materialism) cannot include the intellect. No one has discovered an organ of conceptual thought. Moreover, if our cognitive function is reduced to merely a brain, then it seems impossible to account for any difference between a human’s brain and an animal’s…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature of Mind Summary David Armstrong wholeheartedly believes in “Scientism” and agrees strongly with Materialist views. He starts off by making the point that he absolutely believes that humans have minds. Some people believe that the mind is the physical brain while others have spiritual beliefs about the mind. There are other views and theories out there, but those are the most popular, controversial ones. Although there’s many theories, most people can come to an agreement that all humans have certain functions that clearly link up to the mind/brain.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the movie I, Robot we are introduced to a long debated philosophical question: “What makes a human being human?”. Is the essence of mankind the fact that we are biologically unique among the myriad of different species on this planet? Is it the fact that we seem to have transcended our baser needs in order to try and make the world fit us as opposed to us fitting into the world around us? Is it perhaps that we have what people would call a “soul”? Or is it possibly that we were said to have either evolved from our animal counterparts, the primates, in order to be what we consider better?…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One wishes to argue that this unjustified assumption impedes the pursuit of an answer to the issue of OM. One finds it disturbing that so many people can invest in the consciousness of all humans and even in aliens and AI but reject it harshly when one tries to ascribe the same to animals. There is no logical reason to ascribe minds to humans, as one has previously discussed, and as such there is no reason not to ascribe minds to animals. This is a topic which is becoming more fashionable to discuss, notably from Peter Singer in the 70’s and continued by many, including the work of Kate Jeffery who argues that “If we have minds, creatures with brains very like ours probably do too” (Jeffery, 2014).…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays