In this particular dilemma, I thought the rule utilitarianism theory would suffice me. I would consider my moral rules to help continue happiness for the village and their people. However, there are two different positions I could end up in. Attempting to annihilate the leader is what I would go for. I consider myself I pretty good shot; I was born and raised in Tennessee so I could stand a chance against the guerilla terrorist group. If I was successful on taking out the leader, the others might feel startled by my actions and abandon the mission, and return me to my tourist group. That would be the most ideal situational outcome for me. Sadly, the end can change with just one series of event going a different
In this particular dilemma, I thought the rule utilitarianism theory would suffice me. I would consider my moral rules to help continue happiness for the village and their people. However, there are two different positions I could end up in. Attempting to annihilate the leader is what I would go for. I consider myself I pretty good shot; I was born and raised in Tennessee so I could stand a chance against the guerilla terrorist group. If I was successful on taking out the leader, the others might feel startled by my actions and abandon the mission, and return me to my tourist group. That would be the most ideal situational outcome for me. Sadly, the end can change with just one series of event going a different