Personal Narrative: Mr. Smith Was Insane

Improved Essays
Don’t Mention His Madness -Mr.Smith was insane
Ladies and gentleman of the jury we are gathered here today to discuss the murder of Mr. Jones. The prosecution states that Mr. Smith is completely and utterly sane. As the defense, we believe that the our defendant, Mr. Smith, is insane. The legal definition of insanity is, “could not distinguish fantasy from reality, could not tell right from wrong, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior”. The definition says “or” indicating that the person only has to show signs of one of these example, unfortunately, Mr. Smith can be said to have all three. He doesn’t know what fantasy and reality are, shows impulsive behavior toward the victim, Mr. Jones, and can’t tell what is right and what is wrong.
…show more content…
Smith can’t differentiate reality and fantasy during the time of the crime and weeks leading to it. “Now I could hear a quick, low, soft sound, like the sound of a clock heard through a wall. It was the beating of the old man’s heart.” In reality it is physically impossible to hear a clock through a wall, but in a fantasy anything you think of is possible; therefore, he would be able to hear a clock through a wall as the beating of Mr. Jones’ heart. Also, “Suddenly I knew that the sound was not in my ears, it was not just inside my head.” and, “And still the men sat and talked, and smiled. Was it possible that they could not hear??” Mr. Smith kept hearing a sound inside his head, yet he still believed that the men could hear it. In reality, there was no sound for the men to hear, but in his fantasy the sound was just too loud for them to not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel,” the defendant is appealing his sentence of 111 years and eight months. The defendant was charged and pled guilty to four counts of murder and twenty-six attempted counts of murder, in 1998. During the sentence hearing, the defendant claimed that his actions were caused by a mental disease, and that this…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Good morning ladies and gentleman of the jury. Today, I will be talking about Mrs. Mary Maloney’s case, who is being accused of killing her husband, Mr. Patrick Maloney, a police officer. I am here to plead that Mrs. Maloney is not guilty of first degree murder, under the reason of temporary insanity. After her husband told her that he was leaving her, she went into a state of shock. This state of shock caused Mrs. Maloney to react in an abnormal way, causing her to hit her husband with lamb leg.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ultimately, only a jury can decide the issue of insanity, which in itself may be the most controversial aspect about the insanity defense. In other words, people who have no training in the field, rarely come into contact with the mentally ill and have a minimal understanding of the issues involved, make legal, long-lasting judgments that are frequently based on shifting criteria. If he were to be denied the opportunity to use the defense, there would need to be a secondary set of defenses which allow the charges against him to be greatly mitigated. The team would have to consider accepting a plea to lessen the time he would ultimately be incarcerated. It would be unfavorable but because of the fact that there was actus reus but lacked mens rea, it would be hard to get him not have him serve any time at…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003, Andre Thomas viciously attacked and killed his ex-wife and her two children, and was sentenced to death row. His defense argued that he was not eligible for death row because of his mental state. The court ignored the argument and passed it off, saying that they were using his illness as an excuse to “get out of” maximum punishment. As demonstrated in this case, mental illness is not given the attention it deserves when determining a sentence. Cases such as these have aroused concern how fair the criminal court is towards the mentally ill.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Andrews landed on Death Row after months of daydreaming about how he was going to brutally kill his family members. In November of 1958, Andrews murdered his mother, father, and older sister by calmly lodging .22-caliber bullets into their bodies. His reasoning? Andrews’ father owned farmland valued at roughly two hundred thousand dollars, and Andrews’ yearnings to wear, “gangsterish silk shirts and driv[ing] scarlet sports cars,” (312), had devoured him to the point where he came to the conclusion that, “murdering [his family] seemed the swiftest, most sensible way of implementing the fantasies that possessed him” (312). During his subsequent trial, the psychiatrist staff of the Menninger Clinic had diagnosed the eighteen year old with, “schizophrenia, simple type” (315), meaning that he experienced a such separation of thinking and feeling, that he, according to Dr. Joseph Satten, a member of the diagnostic team, “felt no emotions whatsoever” (316).…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, Judge Awotwi, presided over the mock trial State Prosecution vs. Macbeth, and it is my duty to uphold the rule of law and instruct true justice upon this issue. The defendant entered a plea of insanity due to delusional compulsion before this court on October 24, 2017, after committing beyond a doubt one count of murder and two counts of felony murder. The question is not whether Macbeth committed these crimes, or if he is judged to be found guilty; it is to judge if the defendant “did not have [the] mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong”, and that is the responsibility of the court (16-3-2). Due to the facts presented in court I have come to a verdict. The defense’s unique argument and main points overwhelmed the predominant…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The successful defense of “not guilty by reason of insanity” is rare. However, sometimes the defendant is truly suffering from a severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia, and doesn’t understand that their actions were wrong. When a defendant is found to be insane at the time that the crime occurred, they can’t be unfairly punished for their crimes. Instead, treatment and observational evaluations are necessary. Javier Benitez Jr. was found not guilty by reason of insanity in the 2011 murder of Cynthia Ann Olivarez and the stabbing of her husband.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. It is hard to imagine that serial murderers do not effectively use the insanity defense. Please explain: a) why isn 't it an effective defense? - The insanity defense, is a defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to a persistent psychiatric disease. According to Danny Cevallos, who is a CNN Legal Analyst stated that: the insanity defense is raised in less than 1% of felony cases, and it 's only successful in a fraction of those; moreover, defendants judged to have been legally insane at the time of the offense and subsequently found not guilty by reason of insanity are in almost all cases indefinitely committed to psychiatric hospitals for treatment.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (the narrator). This information shows that the narrator can't be insane because the narrator knew that what he was doing was wrong, otherwise he would not have been guilty enough to confess to the police when he would otherwise have gotten away with the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law and Psychology have to play hand in hand dealing with the process of the defense. There has to be balance in these two in order for the management of the plea. The process of the insanity plea has to be reviewed thoroughly to fix any inconveniences. The other alternatives of the insanity defense are not seen to be quite useful and beneficial.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays