I think the cost is not too much at all. Range Rovers are known for being pretty pricey even when they are used. I was lucky to find this car lower than 30,000. This is not a great piece for a first car but, I do not expect this kind of car to be cheap. Kind of bigger cars like some range rovers, are more on the expensive side because of the space it has. 2016 Chevrolet Cruze LT1 is next for $12,995 fully and $213 a month. My dad has been driving this car for a couple years now and he got it for 20,000 so this is a pretty good deal for not a 2 year old car. I already know my way around the car so i wouldn't be wasting my money at all. “Smaller and pricier than some competitors” a customer says on Edmunds.com. 2014 Mercedes- Benz CLA 250 for $12,000 and $216 a month is next. Since this is a mercedes, it is going to be on the more expensive side so i was honestly shocked when i saw that it was not over 30,000. I always see this car on the road so i would think that it has a reasonable …show more content…
20 MPG City and 28 MPG Highway for the 2014 Range Rover Evoque. This is not very good considering where I am going to living contains some a lot of driving. Only 20 miles a gallon would mean I would have to spend more money on multiple gallons and live closer to where I work. 26 mpg (city) and 38 mpg (highway) is a bit different for the Chevrolet Cruze. This is better than the Range Rover because not only is it 6 hours more but it is over 10 miles more than the city miles. Even though I do not know if i will be use the highway, there is still a more miles on the city. 22 mpg (city) and 31 mpg (highway) for the 2014 Mercedes which is the most expensive car. This is about the same as the range rover just a couple miles more. Now I am starting to realize that this is going to be a normal amount for the cars I chose. So i would have to deal with about 20 and 30 miles per