I agree with your post. I also felt that with each state having a myriad of laws that aren’t necessarily congruent with other states, let alone the federal government, would make it difficult if not impossible to have a single court. Therefore, with the way our system is set up, it is a necessity to have a multi-tiered court. When looking at the downside, I hadn’t contemplated the fact of jurisdictional conflict. It makes sense though; which court would have priority when prosecuting those cases that cross jurisdictional boundaries? This concept ties in well with a point that I made, when it comes to multiple jurisdictions double jeopardy becomes a concern. It seems to be a fine line between prosecuting to the fullest extent possible
