This research contributes to a qualitative advocacy/participatory worldview personal interest paradigm, which was chosen because the study matches an interest in working within the culture of marginalized and disenfranchised young people.
Methodology
While the best practices of conflict theories processes are useful to resolve disputes and intrapersonal conflicts no matter where one may reside, this paper will be limited to the study of transition aged youth that are no longer in the Los Angeles County Foster Care System. The work reviewed in this paper includes considerations and sensitivities associated with the subject group (# ??) previously researched studies, scholarly journals that pertain to which best practices in conflict resolution …show more content…
Through participatory learning, participants can practice trust-building through cases, which have been viewed as indispensable when working to empower young adults experiencing trust issues. A sense of how trust-building is correlated with this learning methodology is identified and discussed by Thompson and Nadler & Lount, 2006). For example, in the absence of trust, one must give and share information. In other words, building trust is a sort of give-and-take. It is not a one-sided exchange, one must be willing to share as well as receive, and be willing to give up something to get something. It is not easy to build trust, neither is it always doable. However, one must ask questions to make that determination. If the other person defers not to engage, then know when to cease from asking questions.
The review submits that there may be a relationship between clarity and empowerment plays a role in the facilities of. Clarity strengthens intended messages and inspires a positive response. In context, clarity strengthens the empowerment process. The authors make a strong case in their methodology to empower and to recognize the transforming effects of those in conflict. This same characteristics can also be seen …show more content…
Of note is a biblical principle, which posits stories of lying and deception. The principle explores the question: does God ever put one in a position where one has to lie? Not if Revelation 21:8 is to be believed, “…and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire…” (Revelation 21:8, KJV). Nevertheless, the credence alludes to lying leads to perishing. It would therefore perhaps be advantageous to refer participants to recall their own experiences with conflict when analyzing and discussing case studies” (Erbe, 2003, p.
Methodology
While the best practices of conflict theories processes are useful to resolve disputes and intrapersonal conflicts no matter where one may reside, this paper will be limited to the study of transition aged youth that are no longer in the Los Angeles County Foster Care System. The work reviewed in this paper includes considerations and sensitivities associated with the subject group (# ??) previously researched studies, scholarly journals that pertain to which best practices in conflict resolution …show more content…
Through participatory learning, participants can practice trust-building through cases, which have been viewed as indispensable when working to empower young adults experiencing trust issues. A sense of how trust-building is correlated with this learning methodology is identified and discussed by Thompson and Nadler & Lount, 2006). For example, in the absence of trust, one must give and share information. In other words, building trust is a sort of give-and-take. It is not a one-sided exchange, one must be willing to share as well as receive, and be willing to give up something to get something. It is not easy to build trust, neither is it always doable. However, one must ask questions to make that determination. If the other person defers not to engage, then know when to cease from asking questions.
The review submits that there may be a relationship between clarity and empowerment plays a role in the facilities of. Clarity strengthens intended messages and inspires a positive response. In context, clarity strengthens the empowerment process. The authors make a strong case in their methodology to empower and to recognize the transforming effects of those in conflict. This same characteristics can also be seen …show more content…
Of note is a biblical principle, which posits stories of lying and deception. The principle explores the question: does God ever put one in a position where one has to lie? Not if Revelation 21:8 is to be believed, “…and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire…” (Revelation 21:8, KJV). Nevertheless, the credence alludes to lying leads to perishing. It would therefore perhaps be advantageous to refer participants to recall their own experiences with conflict when analyzing and discussing case studies” (Erbe, 2003, p.