Though they equally rejected each other's literary aesthetic methods to depictions of racial blackness, they both shared a political aesthetic approach known as perspective. This perspective was displayed as the developing political power of black female voice in the United States. The now notorious literary review of Hurston by Wright have brought many readers to view their works as oppositional, and continue to form the ways in which we read these authors as representatives of a set of contrasts in African American literary history. Wright focused precisely on the gendered nature of Hurston’s writing and narrative illustration of voice. Wright attempted to separate his writing from Hurston's more feminine writing techniques. Wright declares Hurston's use of dialect a continuation of "minstrel technique", but she does this to express her dedication to her culture. By using strong prose in the story and the dialect in the dialogue, she is accommodating to white people while staying true to her own
Though they equally rejected each other's literary aesthetic methods to depictions of racial blackness, they both shared a political aesthetic approach known as perspective. This perspective was displayed as the developing political power of black female voice in the United States. The now notorious literary review of Hurston by Wright have brought many readers to view their works as oppositional, and continue to form the ways in which we read these authors as representatives of a set of contrasts in African American literary history. Wright focused precisely on the gendered nature of Hurston’s writing and narrative illustration of voice. Wright attempted to separate his writing from Hurston's more feminine writing techniques. Wright declares Hurston's use of dialect a continuation of "minstrel technique", but she does this to express her dedication to her culture. By using strong prose in the story and the dialect in the dialogue, she is accommodating to white people while staying true to her own