Personal Ethics: Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill And Peter Singer

Improved Essays
One topic that truly captivates me is ethics. To start, an understanding of ethics is crucial to the study of my three favorite subjects: history, religion and philosophy. But more significantly, I discovered the importance of personal ethics in my daily life through close analysis of the writings of Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer. My personal approach to behavioral decision-making aligns closely with utilitarianism. Rather than focusing purely on my individual happiness, I strive to maximize the amount of happiness for the greatest number of people possible. In following this utilitarian approach, I hope to contribute to increased happiness and productivity in society.

Accordingly, I believe that establishing an Honor Code

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    I argue that lying is permissible in situations where lying is used for the greater good of others, which is supported by John Stewart Mill’s conception of Utilitarianism. According to Kant in the “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” it is not permissible to lie because he defines morality as not harming others, which lying does according to his “Metaphysics of Ethics.” Conversely, Utilitarianism is the theory that right actions maximize happiness, which could mean this happiness is acquired at another’s expense. At the core of this theory is the Greatest Happiness Principle. This principle states that one should act such that one’s actions produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This passage is describes many key elements in Mills argument. Mill discusses indulgences, which Aristotle discusses in Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle describes self-indulgence is applied to childish faults. Children display their feelings when they don’t get what they want, which leads to being spoiled. If they don’t change their ways, will turn into self-indulgent person, which is having an…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three substantial ethical theories in philosophy. Each attempting to prove the others wrong. These theories include: Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics, Mill’s Utilitarianism, and Kant’s Deontological Ethics. In their theories, each thought they had found the answer to finding the truth. Each theory has a hole in it that made others speculate it’s truth.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Questions pertaining to whether certain actions are morally right or morally wrong are never easy to settle. There are various moral theories that try to address the question, divine command theory, virtue ethics, ethical egoism, cultural relativism, to name just a few. There is, of course, not much agreement among moral philosophers as to which is correct. There is, however, much agreement on what is actually morally right or morally wrong. The merits of a particular moral theory will depend (in part) on whether or not it can account for actions most of us consider to be right.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How to ground one's ethical positions is an important question that often arises for anyone studying moral philosophy. Over the course of many centuries, philosophers from Aristotle to Kant have attempted to provide answers to this question. Among the most famous of the proposed solutions is utilitarianism. Coming in many forms and permutations, utilitarianism is an approach to ethics that emphasizes providing the most happiness to the greatest number. It is an approach perhaps most famously advanced by scholars Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs. Kant Essay

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bill and Linda are happily married, however, for the past few months Bill has been carrying on an extramarital affair without Linda’s knowledge. If Linda were to find out about his affair, she would almost certainly be devastated and end their marriage. Bill is also almost certain that Linda would never find out about his affair unless he tells her himself. Considering this scenario, I will discuss how both Mill and Kant would advise Bill in this situation, based on their respective theories of Utilitarianism and the Formula of Universal Law. Further, I will support that Kant's advice to Bill is closer to being the right choice morally than that of Mill.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality as used in the context is defined as the principles revolving around the differentiation between wrong and right behavior of the human. As the last thinker of the enlightenment, Kant was a philosopher that believed that reason was the only thing that morality can come from. In contrast Mill was a philosopher who believed that morality is utility, meaning that something is moral only if it brings happiness or pleasure. In looking at both Kant ’s…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill demonstrate two contrasting moral theories. The philosophers have very different ideas about ethics and happiness. Immanuel Kant, author of “Duty and Reason”, believed in the morality of the good will and duty. According to Kant, happiness is an emotion unable to be controlled while motive is controllable; therefore, duty is the most important aspect of leading a moral life.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is defined as the moral discipline in which deals with what is considered to be right or wrong [4]. The use of non-prescribed drug, a substance intended for use in diagnosis and treatment [5], is a popular subject of study in the field of ethics. From the dawn of its existence till now, the ethical use of drug is oftentimes a gray area of debate for many people. This mainly stems from the many benefits yet potential threats which comes from the use of drugs. There are numerous advantages when it comes to drug such as curing a disease or preventing a potential disease, however, there are also as many potential harms such as body functions degradation.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout our lives, we are given various choices throughout the day that have some sort of impact on us, large or small. The amazing thing about these choices is that we can decide which choice to make. Most often, people decide on how to make these choices based on their wants and desires at the time. People, religion, and cultures allow this type of decision making to occur but often hail good ethical thinking as the best way to use in decision making. Philosophers throughout history have intrigued upon newer and diverse ways in ethical thinking and swear that theirs is the way people should look at the world.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays