His mother was a raging alcoholic, he lost connections with all of his siblings, his father secluded him from the world and he was greatly abused throughout his lifetime. Dick’s life was reasonably privileged; therefore, it was completely in his nature when he turned to committing crimes for pleasure. Perry had an unstable childhood which mentally scarred him. It was in his nurture to turn to committing gruesome crimes. Capote depicts Perry’s life in such a way that the reader feels bad for him and tends to blame the crime on…
Capote practices this technique once more with Dick and Perry’s autobiographies. Instead of including the back stories and earlier lives of the two criminals in the beginning along with the Clutter’s, Capote uses the biographies to finally explain the men. Perry explains “I was born Perry Edward Smith”, a start to solid evidence into the life of Perry Smith. However, Dick “will try to tell” of his “vague” childhood. Capote withholds solid details of the origins of the two and as a result maintains the sense of mystery and Delphian pasts.…
One prominent example is the characterization of Perry Smith, one of the two ex-convicts of the murders. Capote dwelled deep into the character’s psychological past, revealing all of his pains and emotions: The man’s dream of being a psychic (51), being a stage star (31), and his suffering from the horror of his childhood abusers which kept him awoke many nights of his life (57-58). With this detailed characterization, readers can easily understand why Perry was able to heartlessly murder a family whom he knew were nice people. In addition, readers can possibly feel sympathetic to the killer after learning about his dark past of being neglected, bullied and abused.…
Perry is deemed the ‘winner’ of this book, and by winner, the one who seemed to harbor the better reputation in the end. Even though both men are killers, Capote acts like Perry’s lawyer in hopes to reduce the stigma of who he was. Both men were guilty, but in making Perry the weak chick from the batch, it seems as if his death was unnecessary. Capote was torn to the ground in hopes of a better conclusion, he sympathizes with Perry due to their seemingly close paths, and he showcased all that he was and what he could have been. In conclusion, “In Cold Blood” not only involved the death of the Clutter’s, Dick, and Perry but the decline of Truman Capote as he had dug the soil in search for the rabbit hole that would save them…
Also if his family was not how they turned out to be, he could have finished school, and been very intelligent. Capote adds in how Perry approaches his execution to show his sympathy for…
Throughout the entire writing process, when conducting interviews to the residents of Holcomb or the murderers themselves, Capote “[transcribed] conversation without using a tape recorder” and claimed to have “95 percent accuracy” (Plimpton 3). While certainly impressive, it raises questions about many of the smaller details that Capote chose to write about. For example, many of the dialogues and scenes may have been made up, to help strengthen his argument against capital punishment. One such conversation can be found right before Perry and Dick were sentenced to death. Two men were discussing the penalty that they deserved, and while one argued that death was the only option because they “killed four people in cold blood” the other argued that hanging both of them was “pretty goddam cold-blooded too” (Capote 306).…
In Cold Blood: The Head Injury that Eventually Killed Dick Hickock In 1959, the quaint agricultural town of Holcomb, Kansas was robbed of its innocence by the senseless killing of the prominent Clutter family. The perpetrators, Perry Smith and Dick Hickock, were less than extraordinary men; ordinary looking at best, on the outside. However, on the inside, deep within their psyche existed two disturbed men with pasts that culminated in murder. Capote details the life of Perry, creating a round character; in contrast, he provides brief descriptions of Dick while quickly moving on.…
The rhetorical strategies Capote uses to create sympathy towards Perry are simile and alliteration. Growing up, Perry’s parents abused, neglected and abandoned him. As the reader gains a better understanding of Perry Smith’s character, she begins to feel compassion for him. Capote describes Perry’s horrendous childhood in a statement the murderer wrote to Dr. Jones, a psychiatrist.…
Capote gives the readers what the jury did not want to hear, “Perry Smith shows of definite signs of severe mental illness.” Dr. Jones talks about how Perry wasn’t thought the fixed sense of moral values. Perry Smith was different from Dick Hickock in a way that even though they committed the crime together, their state of mind wasn’t. The judge completely refused to question Perry mental stability, because he saw murder as black and…
Capote uses rhetoric effective in making the reader feel some sympathy towards Perry Smith. In the book, In Cold Blood, Capote adds two letters from Perry Smith’s family members. In one letter, Perry’s father talks about Perry as a child, including how Perry was the only one of his kids to really love him, how Perry would stick up for the little kids that were bullied in school, and how “[Perry] was well liked by all the neighbors, and their kids” (146-147). The same letter also talks about the rough upbringing that Perry had. Perry’s mother and father split when he was young and his mother was a drunk who didn’t care much for her children.…
Perry’s descriptions are so well-written it feels almost as if he himself is painting portraits of each murderess in the reader’s head with his…
The complex way that the murderers are written almost makes one feel pity for Perry. The book analyzes the life of Perry before the night of the murders. His past is a very complex one that traumatized him. He was beaten when he peed the bed even though he had weak kidneys, his siblings committed suicide, and his remaining sibling wanted nothing to do with him, which all contributes to the argument later in the book that maybe he was insane because of his unfair and brutal childhood. Even as a child he fabricated things in his head to help him escape the torment of his world, he imagined “ ...that the parrot appeared, arrived while he slept, a bird “taller than Jesus, yellow like a sunflower,”…
He could slide into a fury quicker than ten drunk Indians. And yet you wouldn’t know it. He might be ready to kill you, but you’d never know it, not to look at it or listen to it”. Perry’s short temper and abusive and dysfunctional background were two pieces of Perry that made him different and much more dangerous than Dick. For Perry wasn’t just a man doing bad things like Dick, he was a man doing bad things, and he didn’t understand why they were bad, just that they were viewed as bad to the world.…
In Truman Capote’s novel In Cold Blood, he depicts the horrors of a crime which happened in a small and quiet neighborhood. What gave the novel its legacy, was not only that it was based on real events, but the horrendous details about the crime that was described. In the novel, Capote’s primary focus centers on the character Perry who suffers from Paranoid Schizophrenia. Perry Smith is…
Among many other things, he had a powerful way of drawing in his reader by the tone he used. He pays very close attention to the way that he tells the story in order to generate pathos within the readers mind. In Cold Blood begins with this statement: That statement is basically the only time in the whole book when Capote would be speaking directly to the reader. Throughout the remainder of his work he uses tone and journalistic seriousness to create a feeling of tragedy and sadness that relates the reader to the characters in In Cold Blood. Capote is able to capture the readers attention and pull them into the story as he talks about how Perry and Dick became criminals and how criminality leads to…