The Pequot War impacted several important leaders known as Mason, Underhill, Vincent and Gardener. The monograph has to deal with the accounts of all these important leaders experiences during the Pequot War, and provides a good source for detail to detail of what was occurring during that time in the 1600s, during the Pequot War. The introduction introduces what the Pequot tribe has, how much strength does the tribe really have, and it provides why the Pequot war want to have warfare with the English and that is simply over land. All these leaders wrote how they were helping out the war and what they did to attack the Pequots, writing several in depth details about their experience with enduring the dangerous journey headed towards them against
…show more content…
These primary sources that the author Charles Orr included was to provide a better understanding on how it was like during the Pequot War with the experiences that were being used to this monograph. Sources of the accounts of the leaders provides a much more in-depth imagery created in the readers mind since it shows detail to detail what they were accomplishing during the Pequot War which was in the 1600s. The authors interpretations are consistent, it makes the monograph much clearer to understand based on the little side notes that the author provides for the reader to understand the hard language back then to modern …show more content…
He used a rare account which is Vincent’s only found in the Library of Harvard University and the rest were self-published of their accounts. These real personal documents are well used by the author to support his argument. The author uses very simple language in readers understanding but the written documents are filled with jargon, since it was written in the 1600s and the language back then was different compared to today’s modern English language. The accounts use several hard-complex vocabulary words which would be difficult for the accounts be understand. Throughout the novel the author is impartial, Charles Orr is not biased in any sort of way. He in fact is impartial he gets straight into the account so the reader doesn’t have to be listening to his opinions on the war or of his side of the
These primary sources that the author Charles Orr included was to provide a better understanding on how it was like during the Pequot War with the experiences that were being used to this monograph. Sources of the accounts of the leaders provides a much more in-depth imagery created in the readers mind since it shows detail to detail what they were accomplishing during the Pequot War which was in the 1600s. The authors interpretations are consistent, it makes the monograph much clearer to understand based on the little side notes that the author provides for the reader to understand the hard language back then to modern …show more content…
He used a rare account which is Vincent’s only found in the Library of Harvard University and the rest were self-published of their accounts. These real personal documents are well used by the author to support his argument. The author uses very simple language in readers understanding but the written documents are filled with jargon, since it was written in the 1600s and the language back then was different compared to today’s modern English language. The accounts use several hard-complex vocabulary words which would be difficult for the accounts be understand. Throughout the novel the author is impartial, Charles Orr is not biased in any sort of way. He in fact is impartial he gets straight into the account so the reader doesn’t have to be listening to his opinions on the war or of his side of the