We should get this off the beaten path at this moment: If you are searching for an inside and out strategic investigation of the "Guardiola framework", this isn't the book. In the event that you are searching for a definite record of Pep's four seasons responsible for FC Barcelona, this isn't book either. Rather, this book is (or claims to be) a prologue to the man himself, with understanding into how he considers, what propels him, and why he does what he does. In that sense, Pep Guardiola is a win. The peruser is left feeling that they have a more profound comprehension of how Pep identifies with individuals and how that was the impetus behind specific occasions. More on that later.
The book is separated into three sections, each with an …show more content…
At that point there is a brief record of Pep's childhood, playing profession, and his own mission to learn however much as could reasonably be expected about football from mentors and players whose vision of the diversion he respected. This area covers Pep's chance guiding the B group and how he came to be picked as first-group director. The third part narratives Pep's four seasons in charge, with accentuation on the most imperative amusements, for example, the CL finals and the various Clasicos. Balague talks about finally Pep's association with his players, staff, and the media, and an entire section is given to the "competition" with Jose Mourinho. The last section comes back to the topic of Pep's takeoff, the last diversions, the tributes–and the reaction from inside and without the …show more content…
The book shockingly experiences poor altering. There are various avoidable grammatical mistakes (at one point he says that Inter took Eto'o in return for Ibrahimovic AND paid 46 million Euros in portions!) and in addition reiteration of expressions and sections that make it appear like the book was composed in discrete lumps that were later fixed together. At a certain point he alludes to Pep as "Spiderman" all of a sudden, and it isn't until about the end of the book that he clarifies the similarity. From somebody who makes his living utilizing words, I thought that it was messy and irritating. From a simply authentic perspective, there is not a great deal of new data in this book. The greater part of the substance could be gathered from beforehand distributed sources–interviews, match reports, ect.— and there are a few sections where the peruser feels far fetched that the way the creator relates a story is truly how it happened. The quality of the book lies in the immediate quotes from meetings Balague led with Pep's companions, partners and players (counting one who liked to remain anonymous–for some reason I think it was Dani
The book is separated into three sections, each with an …show more content…
At that point there is a brief record of Pep's childhood, playing profession, and his own mission to learn however much as could reasonably be expected about football from mentors and players whose vision of the diversion he respected. This area covers Pep's chance guiding the B group and how he came to be picked as first-group director. The third part narratives Pep's four seasons in charge, with accentuation on the most imperative amusements, for example, the CL finals and the various Clasicos. Balague talks about finally Pep's association with his players, staff, and the media, and an entire section is given to the "competition" with Jose Mourinho. The last section comes back to the topic of Pep's takeoff, the last diversions, the tributes–and the reaction from inside and without the …show more content…
The book shockingly experiences poor altering. There are various avoidable grammatical mistakes (at one point he says that Inter took Eto'o in return for Ibrahimovic AND paid 46 million Euros in portions!) and in addition reiteration of expressions and sections that make it appear like the book was composed in discrete lumps that were later fixed together. At a certain point he alludes to Pep as "Spiderman" all of a sudden, and it isn't until about the end of the book that he clarifies the similarity. From somebody who makes his living utilizing words, I thought that it was messy and irritating. From a simply authentic perspective, there is not a great deal of new data in this book. The greater part of the substance could be gathered from beforehand distributed sources–interviews, match reports, ect.— and there are a few sections where the peruser feels far fetched that the way the creator relates a story is truly how it happened. The quality of the book lies in the immediate quotes from meetings Balague led with Pep's companions, partners and players (counting one who liked to remain anonymous–for some reason I think it was Dani