People using firearms and racial identity played huge roles in the 19th century history of the United States. One of the 19th century American events where gun violence and race were involved was John’s Brown’s Raid on Harpers Ferry on October 16-18, 1859. This event happened before the President Abraham Lincoln’s service term during 1860-1865. The historical situation at that time had the conveniences for the elimination of slavery and the termination of this system in the U.S. when Lincoln’s priorities was on this issue. In the second presidential term, Lincoln dominant ideology was focused on this goal that helped him winning the second election against the opponent senator Douglas of Illinois State. That meant the termination of slavery
…show more content…
In other words, a contract between slaveholder and slaves was a necessity in which dos and don’ts as well as reward or punishment were listed clearly. It was to help the bilateral exchange of labor were fair enough that prevented conflicts or crisis. In fact, the slavery terminated in the U.S. but African slaves could not manage their lives and they lived in the poor condition until they were able to help themselves in the XX century. Any race of immigrants to the U.S. had their sooner recovery that African; personally, they may be limited in their personal skills after the slavery’s termination. Since 1865 of slavery’s termination until 1960s and the 2000s, there have been outstanding African representatives recognized as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and Barack Obama, respectively. In comparison with Vietnamese refugees after civil war in Vietnam, they have been living in the U.S. just four decades, but they have been showing their group’ recovery among the multicultural groups of immigrants in the U.S. For examples, Janet Nguyen has been a Californian Senator, Bao Nguyen has been Garden Grove Mayor, and Tri Ta has been Westminster Mayor in Orange County. More successful Vietnamese politicians have been recognized in San Jose, North California. Thus, I still assume that slavery terminated sooner than it should be more time in order to …show more content…
The facts have shown that South Korea has been one of the leading economy in the world since they are focusing on their economic development while North Korea has been busy following the tactics in military and politics in order to leverage the international supports because of their hunger and shortages of the necessities for their population. A question is that political system in North Korea can last their service for how long ahead when their tricks seem to be endless via consumption so far. They have shown the international community the truth of their tricks, not anybody hostile telling the bad things about their country. It seems that my viewpoint on the natural solution will come when there is enough conditions for a victory instead of a civil war. Then there would not have any “John’s Brown’s Raid on Harpers Ferry” that led to the loss of normal people and outstanding persons such as Brown, Lincoln because of the opposition of forces who paid any price to protect their capital slaves. If the leaders at that time had a right decision of remaining slavery for states in need until the XX century when there were inventions on mechanics that could replace the physical labor as slaves in agriculture in the south of America, then the
In other words, a contract between slaveholder and slaves was a necessity in which dos and don’ts as well as reward or punishment were listed clearly. It was to help the bilateral exchange of labor were fair enough that prevented conflicts or crisis. In fact, the slavery terminated in the U.S. but African slaves could not manage their lives and they lived in the poor condition until they were able to help themselves in the XX century. Any race of immigrants to the U.S. had their sooner recovery that African; personally, they may be limited in their personal skills after the slavery’s termination. Since 1865 of slavery’s termination until 1960s and the 2000s, there have been outstanding African representatives recognized as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and Barack Obama, respectively. In comparison with Vietnamese refugees after civil war in Vietnam, they have been living in the U.S. just four decades, but they have been showing their group’ recovery among the multicultural groups of immigrants in the U.S. For examples, Janet Nguyen has been a Californian Senator, Bao Nguyen has been Garden Grove Mayor, and Tri Ta has been Westminster Mayor in Orange County. More successful Vietnamese politicians have been recognized in San Jose, North California. Thus, I still assume that slavery terminated sooner than it should be more time in order to …show more content…
The facts have shown that South Korea has been one of the leading economy in the world since they are focusing on their economic development while North Korea has been busy following the tactics in military and politics in order to leverage the international supports because of their hunger and shortages of the necessities for their population. A question is that political system in North Korea can last their service for how long ahead when their tricks seem to be endless via consumption so far. They have shown the international community the truth of their tricks, not anybody hostile telling the bad things about their country. It seems that my viewpoint on the natural solution will come when there is enough conditions for a victory instead of a civil war. Then there would not have any “John’s Brown’s Raid on Harpers Ferry” that led to the loss of normal people and outstanding persons such as Brown, Lincoln because of the opposition of forces who paid any price to protect their capital slaves. If the leaders at that time had a right decision of remaining slavery for states in need until the XX century when there were inventions on mechanics that could replace the physical labor as slaves in agriculture in the south of America, then the