Peloponnesian War Pericles Speech Analysis

Improved Essays
Moreover, the conclusion of the ceremony was a speech delivered by a top Athenian citizen. Even though, Thucydides records the speech from Pericles in first person, there can be some uncertainty that he wrote every single thing Pericles. Thucydides himself says that the speeches are not exact, but are meant to symbolize the key thoughts of what was said. Pericles was perhaps one of the most important and powerful Greek statesman, speaker and general during the Peloponnesian war. Pericles' funeral oration comes from Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War, published in 431 BC. In the beginning of Pericles’s speech, he starts by praising the custom of the funeral for the dead, by honoring the ancestors and the achievement of the empire.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1. Does Pericles claim that Athens is a generous city? Pericles suggests that Athens is a generous city. In his speech he tells of how much grander Athens is because of its generosity.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pericles Funeral Oration

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The speech, “Funeral Oration”, was a eulogy written in the winter of 431-430 B.C.E. by Pericles who was the Athenian leader. Pericles delivered this speech to the survivors of the fallen who lost their lives fighting in the Peloponnesian War. Between 431 BC and 404 BC, the Peloponnesian War was fought between the Peloponnesian League, led by the Spartans, and Delian League, led by the Athenians. Sparta feared that Athens was becoming too powerful, leaving them no choice but to invade, defeating Athens. need to be cited and explain more, also add thesis statement here.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peloponnesian War by the end of the fifth century before the common era commenced with Sparta’s fear of Athens’ rising power. Sparta a primitive, economically challenged land power, led the independent states. In contrast, Athens an advanced, economically wealthy sea power, oversaw alliance states. Even though they both were state super powers, there was a noticeable difference in their culture, economic background and how they led the subordinate states of government. As well as, Sparta’s and Athens’ strategic approach to war, in the beginning, was dissimilar but in the end, the tables would turn and the Sparta would be victorious.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abraham Lincoln’s “Gettysburg Address” was presented in 1863 while Pericles’ “Funeral Oration” was given in 431 BCE. The former was written to close a ceremony dedicating the old battlefield to the fallen soldiers while the latter was presented in a public funeral tradition to honor the dead. Pericles’ Funeral Oration and Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address compare and contrast in terms of historical context, themes, and rhetorical features. Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address and Pericles’ Funeral Oration did share a variety of similar historical contexts, despite the large time frame separating the speeches. Each speech was given after a battle to honor the dead.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Symposium, multiple philosophical thinkers discuss, argue and critique the abstract concept of love and eros. Each thinker had their own fascinating way of describing this phenomenon, but two philosophers- Aristophanes and Diotima- sparked more questions and arguments than any others. Aristophanes was a famously known comical poet in the ancient times and Diotima was a woman who Socrates claimed to met years back who passed on her wisdom on the subject of love. Although both speeches are completely different in style, tone and context, both Aristophanes and Diotima essentially build off of each other’s ideas. Aristophanes's speech focuses on love being a desire for wholeness and instead of refuting this, Diotima criticizes this…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the death of Hector, the ideal tradition changed to an even greater result. With Achilles bestowing a dishonorable gesture to, which he didn’t consider honorable, of Hector. The ideal part of Hector’s burial was a revenge: to avenge his friend, Patroclus. Even though Achilles never encountered the ideal part of how a person represented, he justified the result in which their actions were put into. The perspective source of how the greeks and as us people today, the certain tradition of funerals are different.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whilst these two speeches are written such a long time apart, they both address many of the same topics, including the military, current state of the democratic government, and the constant positive outlook on both America and Athens. Both speeches are similar and different in their own way, however the one almost consistent similarity is the positive outlook that both Pericles and Obama have on their empire/country The speeches although written so far apart from each other, are both so similar to each other in both content and stylistic outlines. Pericles's speech was written to give as a eulogy for the fallen soldiers fighting for Athens, and to make potential soldiers feel like dying in battle is a honorable thing, and to encourage the growth of Athens army. Thousands of years president Barack Obama writes the two thousand thirteen State of the Union Address which was made to give hope to the nation about the present state and hopeful future of america.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the constitution, every citizen of the United States is allowed to exercise free speech, expression, and press. Similarly, in Pericles funeral oration, Pericles talks about the freedom of all the Athenians in the land of Athens. Everyone was able to enjoy entertainment. Education wasn’t limited to the people of Athens, but even foreigners can benefit from the education. Not only that, all Athenians were free to speak, and discuss.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In On the War for Greek Freedom, a compelling work comprised of selections from Herodotus’ The Histories, Herodotus recalls many accounts of history that were relayed to him throughout his life and many travels. Upon returning home to Athens, he spent years putting together The Histories, an elaborate account of the Greco-Persian Wars (499-479 B.C.), and is now credited with being “The Father of History.” Herodotus aids the reader in learning all about the primary and secondary reasons and events that occurred, causing tensions to rise between Persia and Greece, resulting in an all-out war. Decisions and actions by the Greeks, Persians, and even the Spartans during times of great friction will be reviewed and analyzed below as well as the inevitability…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Greeks had larger, annual festivals to remember the dead such as Genesia or “an Athenian festival of mourning”. These frequent and elaborate visits show the importance of visiting one’s grave often. Garland concludes the book by discussing how the Ancient Greek belief in afterlife was a way for people to be continuously reminded of their ties to their families and their undying bond. He continuously mentioned how important it was to honor the dead, and he continued to show this throughout the multiple rituals, ceremonies, and events he described. While the chapters were choppy and usually strayed from the topic, Garland’s knowledge on the afterlife is extensive and helps to answer even the smallest, nonessential…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epictetus’ discourse begins by discussing the things that are in our power in addition to the things that are not. He provides examples that demonstrates the possibility of confusing the two. He explains, “How far does the grammatic art possess the contemplating power? As far as forming a judgment about what is written and spoken. And how far music?…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle of the Speeches According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Pericles was anxious to acquire a style of speaking which, like a musical instrument, would harmonize with his manner of life and lofty spirit” At a young age, Pericles focused on his style of voice until he was at the point he thought was best. He was known to project his voice like the boom of thunder and spoke so well that he could convince almost anyone in the Assembly of anything. He knew how to work words to convince people he was right and how to speak his mind and yet change the attitudes of those around him. In “The Funeral Oration of Pericles,” Pericles demonstrates this ability. He took an…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays