Peloponnesian League Strengths And Weaknesses

Improved Essays
Fellow members of the Peloponnesian League, I recognize that I have little authority to speak in this conference as I am a Spartan hoplite, not a council member, general, or mighty king. I have trained my entire life to be part of Sparta’s magnificent army, I grew up in Sparta and now live there with my wife and children. As you know, Sparta has the strongest army in all of Greece, and we are far superior to the Greek army. Our men are well-trained and prepared to fight. I strongly believe we should fight Athens as not only are they weaker (especially on land), but their thirst for power would destroy Greece. If they controlled Greece they would have to much military and economic power. If we allow them to win Athens will bankrupt Greece and squander of Greece’s resources! Athens will destroy Greece and our great city if we do not stop them!
The Peloponnesian League is better prepared than Delian League to go to war. We have far more experience and better trained fighters, as evident by the brilliance of the Spartan army. In addition cities in Delian League have been weakened by Athens as they are being forced to pay tribute which leaves them with less funding for their military efforts. I believe that the weakness of the other members of the Delian League means we can easily ignore them as a threat as they will not be able to sustain a
…show more content…
I do not doubt that you understand my arguments and agree with me, as you recognize the might of Sparta’s army. While going to war is always treacherous, I have faith that Sparta will defeat the Athenians. Allowing Athens to control Greece would be more dangerous as they are gaining too much economic and military power, which they will use to ruin Greece. The Athenians are weak, and should be simple to defeat in battle, so long as we do not let them turn their city into an impenetrable island. We need to defend our city, our name, our league, and

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Thus, human nature, as Thucydides described it, took people over. It became advantageous to preemptively attack enemies instead of plotting and using moderation, and the idealism of ancient Greece gave way to rapacity and fear (3.83). These changes in Greek society emerged out of necessity due to the circumstances of the war. People could not follow idealist standards because of the constant military threats to the poleis (3.82). The collapse of Greek values in the face of conflict demonstrated the conflict between law and primal nature that Thucydides implicitly established.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However during the so-called Spartan Hegemony, there was an intense rivalry going on between Sparta, Athens, and Thebes. This rivalry led to the downfall of all of the poleis because they spent so many resources on conflicts with potential allies. Additionally, Sparta was very arrogant, leading it to alienating allies. Since Sparta was an imperialistic society, allies could make a difference in the conflicts that resulted from Sparta’s imperialism. Finally, Sparta’s arrogance ultimately led to its downfall.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (580). Hector call for war represents the idiosyncratic desire for fame found in Ancient Greece. Although Hector could potentially strive for a diplomatic approach to this problem, which would reduce damages, he urges to engage in war. The advancement of the Greek war cultures has evidently claimed Hector since he promotes the idea that war and violence are formidable methods of conflict resolution. Accordingly, the collective idea that war can solve transnational conflict is the reason why Hector does not accept gifts or engages in diplomatic talks with the other leaders.The malformed construed mindset shown by Hector demonstrates how the Greek war culture valued honor as it associated it with strength gained through war.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, it can be said that Athens was the one to blame for the war, more so the leaders and their decisions. For they are the ones that led away from peace, their hunger for popularity and their hunger for power consumed them and led to poor decisions that pushed them to start an unnecessary war with Sparta that led to the a downfall for Athens and the end of the Golden…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peloponnesian War In life their will always be fights. In fights their will always be two sides or more, and within those two sides there will be disputing and arguing before they decide to try and destroy each other. In many wars it has been noticed that we could have been able to stop it before it happened. Typically, one side is more to blame than the other by wanting too much power or not settling down. In the Peloponnesian War I believe Athens is more to blame for starting the war than Sparta.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers seem to agree that the morals entrenched into the human mind are derived from the teachings of a higher power, otherwise they’d be completely subjective and the individuals of society would have to choose what's right and wrong. Unfortunately, instead of filling the respective armies with guilt for the disregard of the morals undoubtedly placed upon the land by them, the Greek gods and goddesses instead pick sides in the conflict further spurring the war and causing death. In particular Zeus, Athena, Hera, Apollo, Aphrodite and Ares have their interests displayed in the Iliad. Aphrodite is the cause of the entirety of the Trojan war, by meddling with Helen’s life. She as well as, Zeus, Ares, and Apollo favour the Trojan side of the conflict.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The reason why negotiations break down is that even the tiniest concession will lead to catastrophic change on the distribution of power. The fast transferring of power provides a chance for those nations which want to gain power advantages over contracted nations by tearing up the agreement. For those nations who would likely to make concessions will probably make more concessions in the future, the shadow of the future will prompt them to wage a war instead of…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack Johnson Racism

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Fighting Racism” Jack Johnson is considered as one of the greatest boxers of all time. Jack, who was actually born by the name of John Johnson, grew up in a time when African Americans did not have many rights. Johnson had to fight for any opportunity or almost anything he ever wanted because of racial discrimination. He was never one to be controlled by the social norms of the time; this made him a perfect fit to become a boxer. Jack Johnson had the most influence on the views of racism than any other professional sports player in history.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    War Culture In The Iliad

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moreover, Homer characterizes Achilles as a violent warrior in order to objectify him and illustrate dismantling effects wars have on humans. The Greeks by promoting and engaging in continuous warfare, limited their definition of honor, effectively promoting a social system where honor is gained through the heinousness of war, instead of through benevolence and logical actions. As a result, Achilles strives to become a praised warrior, in an environment where barbaric behavior, like the total destruction of Hector’s body, is tolerated as it executed within the context of war. In contrast, Homer presents Achilles’s encounter with Priam to highlight the difficulty found behind escaping the death , devastation, and the…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justification For War

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Participating in the same behavior and expecting a different kind of result in return puts one at the same barbaric level. Athens is barbaric in their treatment of people and erasing peoples’ families and history. Does that mean that they deserve to be erased from history, too? The Mytilenean king did not want to go to war with Athens, he simply did not want to submit to Cleon’s tyrannical rule. However, the decision to go to war could be justified for the Mytileneans.…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays