Peer Review Responses
I am reviewing Maseo’s work and he chose the prompt that says, “you might respond specifically regarding your own life, or you may respond in theory.”
On the other hand, he used few supports, but did not use them in the best way because he did not give further explanations about how they related to his life or worldview. Whenever he uses the source he does not give enough details that can convince the reader. Some of them, he explained little but they require more persuasive information that makes the reader to be interested of the idea and be able to continue it. He come up a create quotes from the articles or speech, but they are missing some details, which make them irreverent while the reader is reading the essay.
I am reviewing Maseo’s work and he chose the prompt that says, “you might respond specifically regarding your own life, or you may respond in theory.”
On the other hand, he used few supports, but did not use them in the best way because he did not give further explanations about how they related to his life or worldview. Whenever he uses the source he does not give enough details that can convince the reader. Some of them, he explained little but they require more persuasive information that makes the reader to be interested of the idea and be able to continue it. He come up a create quotes from the articles or speech, but they are missing some details, which make them irreverent while the reader is reading the essay.