DOVER HOUSE PLAYING FIELDS
2.4.1 Stage Two Evaluation Criteria table:
Criteria
Weighting Weighted score Reason/comments
STAGE TWO EVALUATION
(No evaluation required at stage one)
1. PASS/FAIL SECTION
(Bidders must pass all the criteria in this section)
1.1 Ability to fund the proposals Not applicable Pass/Fail
1.2 Acceptable credit score rating
Not applicable Pass/Fail
1.3 Conservation of existing community users Not applicable Pass/Fail
1.4 Overview of experience of managing similar facilities with two references from users and owners of the facility or ground. Not applicable Pass/Fail
1.5 Provide details of a relevant case study demonstrating the ability to successfully manage and provide similar sports ground facilities to schools, …show more content…
QUALITY SECTION
Quality of proposals
2.1 Proposals for enhanced replacement pavilion/ancillary facilities (15%)
2.2 Proposed hourly hire fees for each facility and estimate of total annual income with supporting evidence to demonstrate that the figures quoted are both realistic and achievable – 25%
2.3 Detailed proposals for continuity of changing facilities during construction of new pavilion (15%)
2.4 Management and maintenance proposals including evidence for continued reinvestment for replacement of facilities (15%)
2.5 Provision of artificial pitch to Sport England/National Governing Bodies for Sport (NGBs) requirements (7.5%)
2.6 Provision of artificial lighting to Sport England/ National Governing Bodies for Sport (NGBs) requirements (7.5%)
2.7 Other value added initiatives (15%)
(A total of 100% available to be weighted to provide a total of 40% of the final quality section of the evaluation) 40%
3. FINANCIAL OFFER
Financial offer:
3.1 Option 1: No Council investment
- Proposed annual rent with yearly increases linked to RPI – this will take into account the proposed rent free period.
Worked example:
Proposed annual rent - £75,000 for a term of 25 years with 18 months rent free
2.4.1 Stage Two Evaluation Criteria table:
Criteria
Weighting Weighted score Reason/comments
STAGE TWO EVALUATION
(No evaluation required at stage one)
1. PASS/FAIL SECTION
(Bidders must pass all the criteria in this section)
1.1 Ability to fund the proposals Not applicable Pass/Fail
1.2 Acceptable credit score rating
Not applicable Pass/Fail
1.3 Conservation of existing community users Not applicable Pass/Fail
1.4 Overview of experience of managing similar facilities with two references from users and owners of the facility or ground. Not applicable Pass/Fail
1.5 Provide details of a relevant case study demonstrating the ability to successfully manage and provide similar sports ground facilities to schools, …show more content…
QUALITY SECTION
Quality of proposals
2.1 Proposals for enhanced replacement pavilion/ancillary facilities (15%)
2.2 Proposed hourly hire fees for each facility and estimate of total annual income with supporting evidence to demonstrate that the figures quoted are both realistic and achievable – 25%
2.3 Detailed proposals for continuity of changing facilities during construction of new pavilion (15%)
2.4 Management and maintenance proposals including evidence for continued reinvestment for replacement of facilities (15%)
2.5 Provision of artificial pitch to Sport England/National Governing Bodies for Sport (NGBs) requirements (7.5%)
2.6 Provision of artificial lighting to Sport England/ National Governing Bodies for Sport (NGBs) requirements (7.5%)
2.7 Other value added initiatives (15%)
(A total of 100% available to be weighted to provide a total of 40% of the final quality section of the evaluation) 40%
3. FINANCIAL OFFER
Financial offer:
3.1 Option 1: No Council investment
- Proposed annual rent with yearly increases linked to RPI – this will take into account the proposed rent free period.
Worked example:
Proposed annual rent - £75,000 for a term of 25 years with 18 months rent free