The Ethical Dilemma Of Designer Babies By Paul Knoepfler

Have you thought about how one chromosome in our genes can change the way we are today as we? Even though Knoepfler and Enriquez both have differing views of CRISPR and gene-editing using pathos, ethos, and logos, Knoepfler has a more suitable demeanor with him being in the field of science and having experience in his end which makes it more approachable and understandable. Paul Knoepfler talks about the ethical dilemma on designer babies while Juan Enriquez explains the reprogram of life and other non-natural mutations and how to decide on how doing it wisely. Both of them talk about the exceptional results and flawed results of GM, which stands for genetic modifications. Knoepfler uses pathos in his talk “The ethnic dilemma of designer babies” by giving a story in the first couple of minutes during his talk. To begin he is very comfortable when it came to talking with the audience, he is confident about what he is saying as a story that could relate. The story is to imagine seeing yourself fifteen years from now with a son or daughter who is a natural baby, she’s called a natural baby due to having no GM. In the story Knoepfler tells how the parents of Marianne not belonging in the social circle because they don’t have a genetically modified baby with upgrades. Could you imagine a future like this where you would have to …show more content…
There is an example of him explaining GM in his way it’s called life code. How he defines life code in his way is “lifecode is the various ways we have of programming life”. He starts it off with a plant for example by explaining how life code can change it into something new and then so one to another plant. The process just keeps repeating and repeating. There’s many more examples like this one that show the same process and how it concludes with the end