Patrick Henry Dbq

Decent Essays
Patrick Henry at a Debate in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5 1788, and James Madison, in the Federalist, Number 10, 1787 represent two different perspectives on the ratification of the constitution. Anti-federalists and federalists were opposing forces in the ratification process. Anti-federalists wanted to prevent the constitution from being ratified while the federalists favored a strong central government and the passage of the constitution.

Anti-federalists were against the ratification of the constitution. They feared the constitution could lead to autocratic tyranny. They also felt that their civil liberties were in jeopardy and desired a list of guaranteed civil liberties. Patrick Henry holds an anti-federalist view in his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution attacks the rights of the people. In Patrick Henry’s speech to the Virginia Ratification Congress on June, 7 1788, Patrick Henry strongly opposes the ratification of the new constitution. He considers the Constitution to be an attack on liberty, because it strengthens the national, or central, government. Henry expects the government, especially the President, to turn tyrannical, and expects the United States to transform into a dictatorial state because of the absolute powers granted to Congress and the President. Henry specifically critiques the power of the Congress to maintain a standing army and directly tax the people, and the President’s power to control the judicial system and military.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soon after came to be two new ideas known as political parties which were the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. They fought from day one about everything including significant documents. Federalist and Anti-Federalist had many problems with each other which was known as the great debate. Stated in the new U.S. Constitution there isn’t security in the system for rights of people with ideas different than others or was their security for the liberty of the press (Document 2). The Legislative Branch which makes the laws that…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Newly attained independence upon the denouement of the Revolution, provoked fierce debate concerning the proper governmental path. America was divided into two factions: Federalists and Republicans. James Madison in unison with his fellow federalists pursued a centralized government and ratification of the Constitution. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 assembled to address the increasingly overt weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first man to ease the fears and concerns of the people was James Madison. He promised that a Bill of Rights would be added to the Constitution as individual amendments if they would, in turn, be ratified. The greatest dissension and opposition towards the Constitution was in New York. In order to counteract the anti-federalists present in New York, James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote a conglomeration of essays called “The Federalist Papers”. These essays discussed the positive reforms that the Constitution would make, and how they would better the states as a whole.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Apart from the states ratifying conventions, the debates also took the form of a public discussion, mainly through newspaper editorials, with federalists on one side supporting the constitution, and anti- Federalists objecting to the Constitution. Writers from both sides tried to convince the public that precious liberty and self-government, hard-earned during the late Revolution, were at stake in the question. Anti-federalists such as Centinel, the Federal Farmer, and Brutus argued that the new Constitution will ultimately lead to the dissolution of the state governments, the consolidation of the Union into “one great republic” under an unchecked national government, and as a result the loss of a free, self-government. Brutus particularly alleged that in such an extensive and diverse nation, nothing short of despotism “could bind so great a country under one…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dividing the parties almost completely in half were two groups with called the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were more for a weak central government and more power to individual states, also their biggest argument was for a Bill of Rights. Now on the other hand the Federalists wanted a stronger central government and were against a Bill of Rights because they believed the government would give them rights. The Anti-Federalists main argument for a Bill of Rights was that there were certain rights that were guaranteed to people that the government should not infringe upon.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While the Constitution was well written, it lacked the protection of human rights. Even though they did not want too give too much power to the people, it was important to protect their rights should the government try and take them away. The Bill of Rights, of the first ten amendments to the constitution were then drafted. “By early 1789, even Madison had come to agree that some sort of bill of rights was essential legitimize the new government in the eyes of its opponents” (Brinkley 108). This Bill of Rights would ease opposition to the new Constitution, as people would feel assured that they were not being taken advantage of and still had their natural rights.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists generally loosely viewed the constitution, and disregarded the need for smaller state legislatures. In document D, Daniel Webster criticizes Madison’s military policy, using the Constitution to prove his point that it is unconstitutional to draft men and children for militia. Webster altered his political views in order to bring opposition the Democrat Republicans. His speech solidifies the idea that parties change their views when they have power. Adding on to the reverse of political views, document E discussed the Hartford Convention, which was a meeting of the New England Federalists to debate on-going matters.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalist Analysis

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the concerns of the Anti-Federalists is that people would prioritize their own social class. This is one of the reasons they are so concerned with elitism. The Federalists argue that this is not the case, “Is it not natural that a man who is a candidate for the favor of the people and who is dependent on the suffrages of his fellow citizen for the continuance of his public honors should take care to inform himself of their dispositions and inclinations and should be willing to allow them their proper degree of influence upon his conduct?... [There are] strong chords of sympathy between the representatives and the constituent.” (Federalist 37, 219).…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judicial Branch

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Local and national considerations would influence “state conventions of delegates elected by the people of each state” in order to complete the ratification process. During the ratification process, two opposing sides emerged, the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Federalists were advocates of Federalism, supporting a strong government and the principles in the Constitution (including a strong national government), while the Antifederalists were a group of people who opposed the authorization of the 1787 Constitution and supported a “decentralized” government rather than a unified one. Throughout the ratification process of the Constitution, these two groups fought over how much power the national government should have, the safeguards needed to prevent a misuse of power, and the possible source of…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays