The evolution of techniques and skills has led to more opportunities to keep patients alive, and ethical conflicts point out sometimes when a patient refuses of life sustaining treatment prior to can be viewed by the medical staff as unreasonable stubbornness because for them we ought to choose life over everything. But they have a hard time to understand those patients’ decisions for not choosing life. Sometimes living can be worse than being dead. Is it considered living or breathing if I am a life because of machines? This raises to health professionals as to everyone, many questions about this vital dependence of the patient against these supportive treatments (life support). One can indeed wonder who decides the merits of the prosecution
