Patenting Genes Cons

Decent Essays
The effects of patenting genes are world wide and can be very negative to the global medical and, scientific community. The Supreme Court Unanimously voted to only allow medical and scientific research companies to patented non naturally occurring genes in 2013. Although there are still major cons and downsides to the patenting of Genes that are used to debate the strengthening of the law that exists today. The main cons of patenting genes are; Firstly is the increased lab result waiting time that can directly affect people who have a specific disease or illness, Secondly patenting genes can cause a company to create an exclusive market or monopoly on their patient ,and Lastly patenting genes hinders research in the scientific and medical community.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Paper #- Gene Patents In the op-ed piece, “Patenting Life” by Michael Crichton, on how gene patents have interfered with medical testings, research studies, and the miscommunications between doctors and their patients. On the other hand, in the article, “Decoding the Use of Gene Patents” by John E. Calfee, he goes on to say that patients and researchers are getting the benefits of patent genes. Although both authors shine light on the effect of patent genes, they both disagree on human innovation blockage, the denial of research studies, and the cost of patient care.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gene Patent Michael Crichton in “Patenting Life” and John E. Calfee in “Decoding the Use of Gene Patent” discuss gene patent. Both agree that gene patent is overpriced, and research companies shouldn’t have the right to own patient’s tissues, but they disagree about the harmful of gene patents. Crichton and Calfee agree that the testing for different types of diseases are expensive. They also agree that no other companies are allowed to test because patent holders block any competitor's test. Crichton believes that it can be harmful because gene patent doesn’t allow other manufacturer to personalized suited to our particular body make up.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The issue of patenting genes are discussed In “Patenting Life, “ by Michael Crichton and “Decoding the Use of Gene Patents” by John E. Calfee. Although the authors agree that gene testing can be overpriced, the authors have different views about whether or not gene patenting should’ve been granted. Crichton believes that gene patenting should have never been granted, since he believes they can be used to block innovation, and hurt patient care. He argues that gene patents are used to halt research and prevent medical testing.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to talking about controversial topics such as politics or religion it is no surprise that people will not see eye to eye on the topic. Therefore, it’s no surprise that gene patenting, the act of patenting genes of DNA to be legally owned by private firms or universities, is also a controversial topic that others, including authors John E. Calfee and Michael Crichton seem to have different opinions on. Crichton, who is against the idea of gene patenting believes the research is harmful, while Calfee believes otherwise; stating there is something to gain from patents. In “Patenting Life”(441) written by Michael Crichton he discusses the cons to gene patenting and expresses his own disapproval toward the subject.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crichton Vs Calfee

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One-fifth of any given person's genes are privately owned, is this invasion overly intrusive of one's personal space or should one not be concerned about this at all? Should gene patent holders be allowed to withhold genes at their will or should one be in charge of what happens to their own genes within their body? Michael Crichton, American best-selling author, who wrote “Patenting Life” and American economist and author John E. Calfee who wrote, “Decoding the Use of Gene Patents” both discuss the affects on people when gene patent holders come into the process of medical research. Crichton and Calfee both agree that gene patent holders have ultimate control of what is done with the genes they own, although Crichton emphasizes the cons whereas…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crichton V. Calfee: The Gene Patent Argument Michael Crichton and John E. Calfee both discuss the topic of gene patents in their respective articles, “Patenting Life” and “Decoding The Use Of Gene Patents.” However, the similarities end there as their opinions are the direct opposite of one another, with Crichton expressing extreme displeasure at the idea of gene patenting while Calfee is in support of the practice. Firstly, Crichton believes the patenting of genes as a whole to be a mistake. He believes the practice to be a result of the United States Patent Office (PTO) “[misinterpreting] previous Supreme Court rulings” (Crichton 441).…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The development of this technology will lead to a society gap between those who are genetically enhanced and those who have “natural genes”. Additionally, this manipulation will also deprive a child from its natural rights and will cause hardships in the future. Lastly, genetic engineering has the potential of ending the life of the embryo due to its relatively new technology. This manipulation of genes will result in catastrophic outcomes that will harm…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This can cause issues with the relationship between doctors and their patients if the patients believe they’ve been misdiagnosed by the doctor’s own doing. In reality, the doctors can’t actaully screen their patients for every problematic gene because of patents held over said genes. Fortunately, the Supreme Court prevented this from to fruition. Their decision takes a strong stance against lazy, non-inovative patenting.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Myriad Genetics

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the afterword, Skloot discusses the commercialization of human tissue, the patents on various genes, and the fact that the companies who own the patents dictate what research is done on the genes. This is troubling for the reason that it limits the time in which scientists find a cure the genetic disease. One, in particular, is Myriad Genetics, the owner of the license for the BRCA and BRCA2, which is the main cause of breast and ovarian cancer. Skloot exposes her distaste for the unethical business practices of Myriad Genetics by citing a court case filed against them, saying, “Myriad has been accused of creating a monopoly since no one else can offer the test, researchers can’t develop cheaper tests or new therapies without getting permission from Myriad … In May 2009 the American Civil Liberties Union, several breast cancer survivors, and professional groups representing over 150,000 scientists sued Myriad Genetics … scientists involved in the case claimed the practice of gene patenting has inhibited their research” (Skloot 325).…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason being inherited diseases. For instance if breast cancer runs in your family genetically modifying your baby would ensure nothing like that would happen to him or her. The worry of the possibility to pass a trait to you children would be a thing of the past. Using the gene editing science could guaranteed every child a long life and could eventually wipe out many deadly diseases.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the past years biotechnology have been vastly developed and gene patent plays a big role in the society. So what is gene patent? Gene patent is the exclusive right to a specific sequence of DNA given by the government to an individual or organization that claims to have first identified the gene. Once granted a gene patent, the holder of the patent dictates how the gene can be used for 20 years from the date of the patent. Right now, gene patent is used in many companies for research purposes or commercial purposes.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this advancement, parent’s “play God” and design their own offspring. The effects of this feat in medical science damages society. Man’s desire for control pushes genetic engineering in the wrong direction. Recent advancements in genetic engineering allow the prevention…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although human genetic engineering is an innovative process, Leslie Pray and Danielle Simmons provide sufficient evidence to justify the limits that should be placed on these types of medical…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone is made up of their parent’s genes like it or not. Everything about a person comes from their parents to create their DNA. There is good and bad to genetics being passed down. Genes can have many diseases and disorders passed down, there is a way to parents prepare for these problems and prevent these issues. What problems can genetic testing solve?…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Future for Human Genetics People have been around long enough to know that everything changes (for the better or worse). Within the past few years, there has been a lot of debate over the scientific breakthrough of being able to modify the human genome. Many doctors and scientists have welcomed the idea with open minds while others are hesitant to become involved. Some see the dangers involved with the process while others see the endless possibilities coming out of this revolutionary discovery.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays