Passive Euthanasia Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
In 1973, the American Medical Association made an official statement on the topic of euthanasia. The AMA said that the intentional end of a life, or “mercy killing”, is a direct contradiction to what the medical profession stands for, but they said that the end of extraordinary means to keep someone alive is permitted. Rachel says that the statements leads to a distinction between intentionally killing and letting die. While this distinction is a big one, Rachel says thats its an morally unimportant one. The distinction between killing or active euthanasia and letting die or passive euthanasia lies in the intentions. Active euthanasia is when you take steps to intentionally end a persons life. Passive euthanasia is when you take away extraordinary

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For James Rachels, as Barcalow says on page 252 of MP, “letting someone die is often no better from a moral point of view than killing someone.” Rachels challenges the view that killing someone, that is, via active euthanasia is far worse than letting someone die, that is, via passive euthanasia. Rachels thinks that sometimes even letting someone die can be far more worse than just outright killing them. To demonstrate his argument, Rachels gives a thought-experiment addressing this issue.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent deaths of Fernando, Maria, Martin and Elisa Manrique has caused much controversy and discussion in regards to euthanasia. Claire Harvey’s saddened opinion piece “This wasn’t a murder-suicide. It was cold-blooded murder” contends that Fernando Manrique “had no right to kill” his family and himself, as “autism and disability are not justifications for murder”. Adopting a dismissive tone, Harvey belittles opinions that their deaths are due to “disability” or of “the tale of a man driven to despair by society’s failure to help him”, with the hope that the audience will reconsider their own opinions.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is morally good to respect a person’s autonomy as well as the wishes of a patient whom has indicated their intent in wanting to not continue their suffering, perhaps as expressed with a DNR order. In the instance of a patient on life support, they can request to be taken off of these life-supporting machines, and die; a case of passive euthanasia. In his article “Active and Passive Euthanasia”, author James Rachels argues that from a moral standpoint, there is no difference between active and passive euthanasia or killing someone and letting someone die. For Rachels, the decision of inaction is an action in it of itself, and overall the outcome of both is ultimately the same: the death of the patient, although active euthanasia is more merciful to the patient (Rachels). Bailey experiences a loss of autonomy in functioning as a human being without aid from others.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With passive euthanasia (PE), patients are killed due to natural causes. If patients are hooked up to life sustaining equipment, it is permissible to remove the equipment. This may cause the patients to die, but it is not medically induced; if it wasn’t for the medical attention, they would have already passed away. However, with active euthanasia (AE), physicians end peoples’ lives short before natural causes would otherwise kill them.…

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In James Rachel’s “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” he specifically argues, “that the traditional distinction between killing and letting die is untenable” (Rachels, 1975, p. 678). Rachels believes killing is not any worse than letting someone die. Therefore, passive euthanasia is not better than active euthanasia. For legal reasons, physicians may have to differentiate the difference between passive and active euthanasia, but, “they should not give the distinction any added authority and weight by writing it into official statement of medical ethics,” (Rachels, 1975, p.678). Active euthanasia is defined as killing the person directly.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a good point he identifies, “ The decision to let a patient die is a subject to moral appraisal in the same way that a decision to kill him would be subject to moral appraisal.” (Rachel, p. 291). Either way the two euthanasia has the same morally outcome. Rachel considers this as an “Faulty Analogy.” Yes they are still a significant moral difference between the two, but that doesn’t mean every instant of active euthanasia is wrong morally.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachel’s argues against The Difference Thesis he says that the issue of active and passive euthanasia is not a morally relevant problem: there is no moral difference between killing and letting die (863-864). He believes that killing is not always worse than letting die. Rachel’s argument has exceptional impact on one’s ideas. He uses an example of two men Smith and Jones. Smith will inherit a large sum of money if something fatal were to happen to his 6 year .old…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is the intentional termination of a human 's life, at the explicit request of the one who dies, with the aid of a physician. Should a person have the right to take another person 's life or his own when he/ she is incurably ill and in pain? There are many things that go along with assisted suicide more than just why it should or should not be legal. PAS is legal in five U.S. states, California, Vermont, Oregon, Washington, in these states it is mandated by state law but in Montana, it is mandated by court ruling.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rachel’s paper he wants his readers to reach the conclusion that “active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible” (Rachels 266). In his paper he chooses to expand and revise a Utilitarian argument, but for this paper I am choosing to focus on his discussion of “the argument from mercy.” Rachels chooses to focus on one main point of the argument from mercy, “Terminally ill patients sometimes suffer pain so horrible that it is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experience it” (Rachels 267). This quote helps to point out that people who usually argue against active euthanasia are not usually people who have experienced a terminal illness and the possible pain that can accompany that.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1975, published in New England Journal of Medicine, Rachels wrote an essay discussing the ethics and moral permissibility behind euthanasia titled “Active and Passive Euthanasia”. In this essay, Rachel 's begins by giving his own definition of passive euthanasia saying that it is taking the action of ending or withholding the necessary medical actions to keep someone alive who is otherwise going to die without it. Rachel 's continues by saying that active euthanasia is taking direct action to end the life of someone who is going to die regardless of medical treatment. Rachel 's then links these definition to what he believed was the standard view on euthanasia and cites statements endorsed by the American Medical Association (also known as the AMA). Rachel 's interprets the statement by the American Medical Association which was endorsed by the house of delegates in december of 1973 as “accepted by most doctors”.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, it will be argued that there is a moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. The distinction is that active euthanasia is the direct involvement of action that cause someone to die. However, passive euthanasia is the inaction of allowing someone to die by not doing something that would prolong the patient’s life. I cannot agree with James Rachel argument of “the bare difference between killing and letting die does not, in itself, make a moral difference,” because killing in active euthanasia and letting one die in passive euthanasia can be differentiate in the notion of the principle cause, intent, and motive of the action vs inaction (Vaughn, 2017).…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defeat this belief and undermine such closed minded views, I will raise an argument against active euthanasia in hopes to encourage doctors and other individuals to reconsider their current thoughts. Although, one might disagree with Rachels stance, I agree with his argument because there is no significant moral difference between passive and active euthanasia as the person will presume to be deceased after all. Thus, making his argument consistent and the doctrine, active euthanasia, just as justifiable and permissible as passive euthanasia. In some cases, it is permissible to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action intended to kill the patient. Not only is this view adopted by most doctors, but it is accepted in the American Medical Association statement: “…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Active Euthanasia is intentionally killing someone. Another look at active euthanasia is murder. It is ethically, wrong.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are different types of euthanasia— active and passive euthanasia, and voluntary, involuntary, and non voluntary euthanasia. Active euthanasia, as mentioned earlier, is basically killing the person, whereas passive euthanasia is an act where you let the other person die. Voluntary euthanasia happens when someone takes their own life— either by refusing treatment or literally killing themselves. Involuntary euthanasia happens when someone ends the life of another person without their consent. Non voluntary euthanasia happens when the person has no consent over his or her own life, and has to be decided for them either by family, physicians, etc.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference between active and passive euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is thought to withhold medical treatment and allow a patient to die, while active euthanasia is intentionally causing death of patient who is experiencing suffering to free them of the agony. In certain case Rachels believe active euthanasia is more preferable. He believes that both should be legal, believing in some cases passive euthanasia is just as bad or even worse than active…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays