The Morality Of Active And Passive Euthanasia

Improved Essays
I believe that Mr. Rachels would agree with my argument above. In his article titled “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” he explains two scenarios; a case involving a patient with incurable throat cancer, and another involving a baby with Down’s syndrome and a easily treatable intestinal blockage. Though these arguments cover a wide range of cases, they don’t appear to apply to Ms. Reese’s case. Throughout James Rachels’ discussion of the morality of active versus passive euthanasia, he fails to mention a case in which a patient is diagnosed with a disease that is untreatable, not life immediately threatening, and quite painless as the disease progresses. These characteristics are reminiscent of Alzheimer’s disease as Ms. Reese has been diagnosed. …show more content…
In Ms. Reese’s case, the question is whether or not active euthanasia should be carried out per her request. Let’s discuss for a moment the possibility of passive euthanasia for Ms. Reese. As mentioned in the vignette, Alzheimer’s disease would most likely be a contributing factor to Ms. Reese’s eventually death. What this essentially means is that Ms. Reese is in no immediate danger. Over a relatively long period of time, Ms. Reese’s brain tissue will perhaps eventually deteriorate to a terminal point. That being said, this process will take a long period of time and will be painful. Rachels’ argument about the gentleman with untreatable throat cancer is known to endure a painful road to death within a short period of time. This case is almost polar opposite to Ms. Reese’s. To allow for passive euthanasia would cause an absurd amount of pain and suffering for the patient when he is bound to die within a relatively short period of time. It would be irresponsible to allow for this patient to suffer so significantly before reaching death directly caused by the cancer. Ms. Reese, however, is able to continue to live with a virtually painless disease. In fact, Ms. Reese will most likely forget about the fact that she was even diagnosed with the disease all together (of course as a result of the deterioration of her brain). These cases are very …show more content…
Reese. Based on the stance which Rachels took on both of his arguments, it appears that Rachels would agree that active euthanasia would not be called for in Ms. Reese’s case. The passive versus active euthanasia argument don’t really apply to Ms. Reese’s case considering that Alzheimer’s may eventually contribute to her death. Furthermore, the process to reach this eventual death is one without pain or suffering. Ms. Reese’s case may not fit the arguments made by Rachels, however it appears that he would, as well as most rational people should, agree with my earlier

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Rachels and Brock” Rachels thesis is active euthanasia is morally permissible under conditions when passive euthanasia is morally permissble and the patient wants active euthanasia. Rachels argue there is not a difference between killing someone or letting one die( Rachels pg 649). Rachels makes reference to patients with terminal illness. Once treatment is no longer allievate pain, the patient and family is requesting help because of the suffering. Rachels introduce another point the Conventional Doctrine makes decisions concerning life or death on irrelevant grounds( Rachels pg. 650).…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The AMA doctrine claims passive euthanasia is more ethically acceptable than active euthanasia. In his first argument, if a patient suffering terrible pain is going to die anyway, it would be unnecessary to prolong his life for a few more days. A few more days will not change the patient’s health status and giving him more medication will only keep him alive for a few more days. In this case, passive euthanasia can be time consuming and unnecessary, causing the patient more suffering. Active euthanasia will have more directive actions and stop the pain instantly.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Active and Passive Euthanasia” the author Rachels argues that both passive and active euthanasia are permitted. Active euthanasia is purely known as taking a positive action, which is designed to kill the patient who is incurably ill. Passive euthanasia, on the contrary, means easily holding back from doing anything to keep the patient alive. To further explain what Rachels suggests, he uses two cases as an example. First he gives the scenario of Smith who will inherit a large sum of money if his six year old nephew dies.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1975, published in New England Journal of Medicine, Rachels wrote an essay discussing the ethics and moral permissibility behind euthanasia titled “Active and Passive Euthanasia”. In this essay, Rachel 's begins by giving his own definition of passive euthanasia saying that it is taking the action of ending or withholding the necessary medical actions to keep someone alive who is otherwise going to die without it. Rachel 's continues by saying that active euthanasia is taking direct action to end the life of someone who is going to die regardless of medical treatment. Rachel 's then links these definition to what he believed was the standard view on euthanasia and cites statements endorsed by the American Medical Association (also known as the AMA). Rachel 's interprets the statement by the American Medical Association which was endorsed by the house of delegates in december of 1973 as “accepted by most doctors”.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine waking up on a bright early morning to drink a cup of warm coffee, when suddenly collapsing and becoming severely brain-damaged. This is what happened to a young twenty-six year old women named Terri Schiavo. On February of 1990 Terri collapsed due to oxygen being cut off to her brain for several minutes. When Terri arrived at the hospital she was able to breath and maintain a heartbeat and blood pressure on her own; however, her vision was impaired. Terri could still move her limbs and could still see, but she needed a feeding tube connected to her stomach in order for her to continue living.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Kallfelz PHI 3323 – 01 November 11, 2015 Euthanasia Euthanasia is directly or indirectly bringing about someone’s death for their own sake. There are four different types of euthanasia, such as voluntary euthanasia, non-voluntary euthanasia, passive euthanasia, and active euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is when the patient or legal guardian agrees or requests euthanasia. Non-voluntary euthanasia is when the legal guardian agrees or requests to euthanasia while the patient is incapacitated or incapable of making the request. Passive euthanasia is withdrawing and withholding action, allowing the patient to die.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prompt that I chose was “The Timothy Quill Case.” Dr. Timothy Quill starts off the case by describing to his readers about the events that happened. He published the case as an article in New England Journal of Medicine in March 1991. Dr. Quill prescribed barbiturates for his 45 year old patient who was suffering from leukemia, Patricia Diane Trumbull. He also told his patient the amount of drug taken that would be considered lethal.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Active euthanasia allows doctors to do this in a humane way. After all passive and active euthanasia has the same outcome in the end, one just allows the patient peace quicker. People are just used to hearing killing is worse than dying because of how the media portrays both: “Most actual cases of killing are clearly terrible On the other hand, one hardly ever hears of a case of letting die, except for the actions of doctors who are motivated by humanitarian reasons. So one learns to think of killing in a much worse light than of letting die” (865). Rachel’s argument is effective because his example is strong and hard to dispute.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a good point he identifies, “ The decision to let a patient die is a subject to moral appraisal in the same way that a decision to kill him would be subject to moral appraisal.” (Rachel, p. 291). Either way the two euthanasia has the same morally outcome. Rachel considers this as an “Faulty Analogy.” Yes they are still a significant moral difference between the two, but that doesn’t mean every instant of active euthanasia is wrong morally.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defeat this belief and undermine such closed minded views, I will raise an argument against active euthanasia in hopes to encourage doctors and other individuals to reconsider their current thoughts. Although, one might disagree with Rachels stance, I agree with his argument because there is no significant moral difference between passive and active euthanasia as the person will presume to be deceased after all. Thus, making his argument consistent and the doctrine, active euthanasia, just as justifiable and permissible as passive euthanasia. In some cases, it is permissible to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action intended to kill the patient. Not only is this view adopted by most doctors, but it is accepted in the American Medical Association statement: “…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rachel’s paper he wants his readers to reach the conclusion that “active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible” (Rachels 266). In his paper he chooses to expand and revise a Utilitarian argument, but for this paper I am choosing to focus on his discussion of “the argument from mercy.” Rachels chooses to focus on one main point of the argument from mercy, “Terminally ill patients sometimes suffer pain so horrible that it is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experience it” (Rachels 267). This quote helps to point out that people who usually argue against active euthanasia are not usually people who have experienced a terminal illness and the possible pain that can accompany that.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Smriti Kochhar James Rachel in “Active and Passive Euthanasia” tells us the difference between active and passive euthanasia and the role it plays in medical ethics. Being directly involved in the killing of an individual is more socially unacceptable than withholding treatment and watching someone die. However, according to Rachel, both are equally reprehensible. Rachel’s views on active and passive euthanasia are predominantly neutral.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Benefits Of Euthanasia

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “I’d rather be dead than be in a wheelchair, or need a respirator to help me breathe” ("Right to Die: Should Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Be Legal). Terminally ill patients often state they’d be better off dead. Euthanasia is a quiet, painless death used for terminally ill patients. Terminally ill patients are those patients who cannot be cured and are already at great risk of dying. Terminally ill patients only have a life expectancy of six months or less.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays