Pascal: Achieving Scientific Certainty

Improved Essays
Pascal questioned whether human beings could achieve scientific certainty because he believed that there was an infinite and a nothing. He believed that people had very strong imaginations and that it is possible that they came up with this idea there is a higher power, which people refer to as God. Pascal stated, “In short it is the greatest sensible mark of the almighty power of God, that imagination loses itself in that of thought” (Spielvogel p. 495). He believed that people were so caught up in their imagination that they could not distinguish between what was real and what was fake. Pascal seems to argue that God does not exist. He seems to argue that God is just a thought that some people have that they believe is a higher power because

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Galileo: Science, Scripture, and Truth Among the academics that fostered growth in developing European society and scholasticism, Galileo Galilei holds a hierarchy attributable to the highly dynamic time period that his life spanned, as well as an unmatchable intellect that fostered vital observations in the sixteenth century. Often defamed for his religiously controversial discoveries and scientific ideals, Galileo repeatedly rose to contest institutions, like the Catholic church and its adherents, in order to cornerstone the secularization of European science and philosophy. Evident in his “Letter to Castelli” and “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina,” Galileo asserts that there is no use for Catholic scripture in the pursuit of science and reason, though he still gives ample merit to a better-suited purpose of purifying and saving souls. These letters demonstrate a deep opposition to putting faith-based and logically unsound Catholic opinion above calculated and certified scientific fact, which would obliterate any truth to the goal of understanding the physical world.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Pascal’s Wager, he believes that we should live our lives like God exists because we have nothing to lose from it. If we believe in him and he does exist, we get to go to heaven, and if he does exist and we lived our lives like he doesn’t exist, we go to hell. Pascal thinks we have nothing to lose from believing in God but I think that is one of the things that he is wrong about. If we pretend to believe in God just in case he is real so we can go to heaven, wouldn’t God be able to tell if we were lying about it our whole lives?…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history people have been fighting over if God exists or not. Two of those people are named C.S. Lewis, who believed that God exists, and Sigmund Freud, who believed that God does not exist. According to Armand Nicholi, Freud and Lewis thought the question of God was the most important question in the world. Out of the two, one of them had a stronger case for his worldview.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first premise is “If there is a god, he is infinitely incomprehensible, reason can decide nothing here.” This is supported by his first argument that God is beyond our understanding. His second premise is, knowing that God is infinitely incomprehensible, one must wager whether or not God exists. Pascal says, “You must wager. It is not optional.”…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now let’s take a moment and view the perspective of Bonhoeffer. According to Bonhoeffer, he states that we must all be alert of the pitfalls during our quest for moral certainty and the focus of one-principle or one themed ethical approaches. The usual approach focuses on two task: acknowledging a moral principle and applying its fundamental principle to specific ethical issues to determine good and evil, right and wrong, or moral and immoral. According to Bonhoeffer "the first task of Christian ethics is to invalidate this knowledge. " The quest for moral certainty become particularly problematic in addressing what Bonhoeffer calls an "extraordinary situation of ultimate necessities.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This differs from Paine, who was a deist. Paine believed in a God, but held the position that God had to…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal explains that a person should choose to believe in God because they may receive infinite benefits. He does not assume that god exists, but rather asserts that a person should place a bet on his existence. If a person believes in God, and God does exist, they may be infinitely rewarded in the afterlife. But, Pascal also acknowledges that there are drawbacks to believing in god’s existence. Through religious belief, a person is unable to engage in sins, leading to a possible finite cost.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the objection, it is proposed that the Christian “God,” the one that Pascal indirectly refers to, does not exist and that there is another god who punishes those who believe in the Christian “God” and rewards those who do not believe in the Christian “God.” The payoff for either god would be the same as discussed previously, where each of the possible gods is equally probable, than there is no reason to take the side of Pascal. Because there are many possible gods, there is no more of a reason to believe in Pascal’s God than any other god. There are many flaws in Pascal’s Wager that are identifiable. Such as, Pascal’s Wager only offers the belief in one God, whereas today there are thousands of gods and religions in the world.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James and Pascal’s defences of faith in some of their most famous arguments, specifically Pascal’s, devalue faith by making faith selfish, providing an obvious out to faith, and making the decision of faith into a gamble, oddly, his devaluation of faith does not hurt his argument, it makes it easier to convince the skeptics. To prove that Pascal’s argument devalues faith and to understand why it doesn’t negatively affect his argument, it’s necessary to understand the whole argument. His argument can be split into quite a few premises. He starts with the possibility of God, which is the main idea of his argument. Basically, it’s possible that God does exists, and it’s also possible that God does not exist, something nearly everyone agrees on.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that you can define a term by its processes. He also believes that we can look at a brain…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager The “Ontological Argument” was created by Saint Anselm; this argument is in support of God’s existence. His argument is one based on observation and reason not on empirical evidence and is spit in to three parts. The parts include why god exists, why god cannot be thought to not exist, and lastly why atheists are able to think that God does not exist. In the first section he begins with a definition of God that he believes everyone would be accepting of and that cannot be disputed.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    René Descartes was a French philosopher born in 1596. He is often thought of the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. He is also recognized for his work in mathematics, and sciences, where he created a universal method of deductive reasoning. Although he is known for all of theses, his primary field of study was in Philosophy. His most famous quote is “I think, therefore I am” (first written in French “Je pense, donc je suis”).…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays