Partnership Case Study

Improved Essays
Partnership is a form of business formed by agreement of parties which may either be express or implied agreement. In a partnership business, the partnership is liable for all business debts. In addition, each individual recognized as a partner is also personally liable of the partnership debts. The obligations of the partnership are binding only if the parties show evidence of the agreement either as express or implied. When such evidence exists, the parties will be liable for the debts of the partnership. Did Rob, Lulu, Ned and Mr Money bags sign agreement of partnership or have an implied agreement?
The first thing in making the judgment is to determine whether each of the accused had a binding agreement to the Romulus that would make
…show more content…
We ask ourselves the question; did Rob, Ned, Lulu and Mr. Moneybags have implied authority to grant Romulus to enter into contract with Santa Rita Bank and Bank of Money? Implied authority is authority which a court concludes that the principle partners intended to give to the` other partners even though they did not use any words that would confer such authority. To determine if people who have not specifically agreed to become partners are nevertheless partners, the court will look at any relevant evidence to determine what the intent of the parties is. If the court finds out that a person is entitled to a share of the business’ profits then it will be presumed that such a person is a partner in that business even if there is no express agreement. This presumption however, is rebuttable upon providing evidence that a person received his share for some reasons other than being a co-owner of the business. Such evidences include; when the profit share represents wages or salary, when the profit share represents rent for the use of property and when the share represents interest on a loan. Rob was entitled to hourly wage and additional $15 per hour. On top of this, he was to receive 10% of profits made by Romulus. Lulu is also entitled a 10% share of any profits made on top of a rent of $500 per month. On the other hand, Ned is entitled to 10% of profits of Romulus partnership as an interest to the loan he lent the partnership. In this case, Lulu and Rob will be presumed as partners while Ned will be able to rebut the presumption through a written document signed by him and the two principals. Mr Moneybags will not be presumed as a partner since he is not entitled to any

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In another meanings of derivative actions, according to Sulaiman and Bidin (2008), states that derivative actions is brought by a member, but is based on legal action which the company has. For an example, a breach of duty owed to the company. Besides that, according to Sulaiman and Bidin (2008) there is an elements of fraud on the minority which the applicant cannot rely on the exception to the proper plaintiff rule to bring a derivative action on behalf of the company unless if the wrongdoer who is in control of the company has obtained benefit at the company’s expense and the wrongdoer has majority votes to prevent the company from suing. In the related cases is Cooks v Deeks (1916), the majority shareholder has diverted the company’s business to another business excluding the minority shareholder. On the facts of cases, the minority shareholder has sued them on the profit that they have made.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A company is liable for its liabilities and debts. Moreover, limited companies provide a limited liability to their shareholders thereby making the company liable to legal actions until its assets…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Otherwise, company might have liability to subsidiary's employee towards duty of diligence if it has a high level of control over the subsidiary's activities CSR Ltd v Young. Biggs v James Hardie. Conclusion : Gigi is able to sue the company because the director is for both of them and the director is liable a duty of…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a person claims into the unlimited liability system to implement the "tort liability of shareholders according to the proportion allocation principle", that is when the company 's assets is not enough to satisfy the creditors request, to safeguard the security of transactions, the creditor shall have the right in accordance with the proportion of capital contribution of shareholders directly to shareholders claim; dual responsibility mechanism that retro GmbH, implement limited liability and unlimited liability coexist mode, and to replace the limited liability company; guarantee mode also advocated to learn from the British company law, the shareholders bear limited responsibility to ensure to make up for lack of limited liability to the creditor, and can prevent the abuse of limited liability, damage the interests of creditors. There is no denying the fact that some of these opinions are reasonable, but it can be concluded that the analysis can be concluded. First of all, the inherent nature of unlimited liability inherent in the problem, that is, the risk is too large for investors, and can not encourage a wide range of investment, and social production is not adapt. Secondly, although it is an earlier form, but this mode of responsibility destroyed the existence of modern corporate survival and…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The proof showed that Mr. Gilford was concerned that, in doing so, he maybe in breach of his contract not to solicit Gilford’s customers. A company was established to conduct the new business, in which the only shareholders were Mr. Horne’s wife and one of his business associates. The company conducted the rival business and Mr. Horne ran the company. Gilford Motor argued that the court should pierce the corporate veil to recognize that the person behind the new company was Mr. Horne and to treat the company, along with Mr. Horne, as being bound by the non-compete clause in the contract. The court found, in this case that the company had been formed for the sole or dominant purpose of avoiding the non-compete clause.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Indian Oil Case Study

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In fact, when the goods have been delivered only for a storage purpose, there is no intention that the property passes to the keeper so “the mixed bulk will be owned in common by the contributors […] in proportion to the amount of [their] contribution . This conclusion has been confirmed in Indian Oil Company Ltd v Greenstone Shipping to the situation where oils of an original owner were wrongfully and irreversibly mixed with other oils of the same nature since they were still identifiable as a part of the mixed bulk owned in common . However, when goods of different kinds and from various owners are wrongly blended in a way that they are transformed in a new product, the original owner will still be able to trace its property even it its identify has changed. For example, in Glencore, blended bulk made of different grade of oils was also owned in common by the contributor in proportion of their contribution. As innocent parties, contributors were also entitled to recover damages from the wrongdoer.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, whether those duties are effective in legal practice is a debate. In my opinion, the duty to act with reasonable care and diligence and the duty to prevent insolvent trading have not helped to prevent companies going into insolvency. The reasons are outline below. Explanation Directors have duties to ensure best interests of the company as whole including creditors. Under Corporations Acts, directors are required to act with reasonable care and diligence and prevent insolvent trading.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cash Discounts

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Direct Write-off method: A company will record the uncollectible accounts when they determine that a specific customer account is uncollectible. The company will then write off the account by debiting bad debt expense and then taking the accounts receivable account and crediting it. 2. Explain the reasons why one of these methods is preferable to the other and the reasons why the other method is not usually in accordance with generally accepted accounting…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The investor would have to prove that they relied on the information but they don’t have to prove that it was the defendants fault. The defense for this would be good faith (acting without scienter)that I had no knowledge that the statement was false or misleading. I had no idea about the overstating of the net sales and net profits or the siphoning of profits by the company President, but he did notice suspicious entries he believed to be bribes that he didn’t investigate further. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202) b. Reginald Varghese would not be found liable under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 act. Rule 10b-5 bars any person from making a misstatement or omission of material fact in relation to the purchase or sale of any security.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An important characteristic of a partnership is that every partner is a principal as well as an agent for the other partners. The agency relationship that exists in a partnership creates express, implied or ostensible authority. The partners have an implied authority to sell and purchase property for the partnership as well as enter into contracts on behalf of the firm. The partners also owe mutual fiduciary duties to each other. These duties include the duty to render accounts, accountability for private profits, and a duty not to compete with the…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics