In “The Story of an Hour”, Mrs. Mallard’s sudden death when she finds her husband at the door is misinterpreted by her doctors: “they said that she had died of heart disease – of joy that kills” (9). The use of an omniscient narrator has been used to channel the view and expectations of the patriarchal society as well. For instance, Wang points out that, “Louise lives as Mrs. Mallard in life and dies as Brently Mallard’s wife, as she is called Mrs. Mallard in the very first sentence of the story and “his wife” (8) at the very end of the story. The only time when she wins her own name back is the moment when she has achieved her “self-assertion which she [has] suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being” (8), and this is the time she has gained her self-identity”. Eveline also seems to be weighed down by the expectations of others as she wonders how her co-workers would react once they learned of her planned …show more content…
Mallard and Eveline cannot express themselves freely. It can be argued that both stories are written from a 3rd person perspective with the intention to state the fact that neither protagonist is able to express her own feelings in her own words. Indeed, Eveline does not even talk in the story. It is as if these characters need a channel to express what is going on in their minds for they have no voice and lack the freedom of speech. Eveline demonstrates this again in her indecisiveness, deserting Frank, her lover, and throwing away her ticket to freedom looking “passive, like a helpless animal” (859). Mrs. Mallard displays her repression when she sinks into her armchair, “pressed down by a physical exhaustion that haunted her body and seemed to reach into her soul” (6). Wang says that it appears to be the result of Mrs. Mallard’s long term self-control or restraint in the male dominated society in addition to Mr. Mallard’s abrupt death.