It has been mentioned while examining the structure of the biblical narrative that there is one argument that stands for the extraordinary treatment of the eleventh hour workers, that is, they were designated to work, only they lacked the opportunity. With the addition of the extra conversation (ibid.: 515-520), however, this theory fails to function as far as Pearl is concerned. In the poem, therefore, it seems that not only is the last group anxious to deserve, and so, to work for their payment, but also the second group. On the basis of this, one may suspect that each and every worker has the affinity to work diligently, and the only difference between them is the duration of labour. Reflecting all this knowledge on the Pearl-Maiden, who is indeed one of the eleventh hour labourers, her “wage” does not seem to be so unfairly distributed, after all, she is one of all the workers, and she cannot help being hired later or to be more precise, being called away earlier by the …show more content…
Origen, by claiming that he has only transmitted the basic teaching of the parable, urges the ones who are, as he puts it, “qui nobis fuerit peritior […] sublimiore, ac majora, et cum omni intelligendi facultate super hac parabola reperturum, et depromptis solerter Scripturae verbis argumentorum copiam” (Patrologiæ 1362). His exhortation appears to have found its way to the Pearl-Poet, who, indeed, realized it in compiling his poem . By manipulating the interpretation of Origen, he managed to convey a completely new message in Pearl. Instead of comforting those who joined the Church at an advanced age, the Pearl-Poet might offer consolation to those who lost their relatives at a tender