Pandora's Promise Analysis

Improved Essays
Americans, and the rest of the world, should switch to nuclear power because it produces great amounts of energy with little to no waste, is constantly available and reusable, and nuclear energy is safe.
Nuclear energy provides great amounts of energy with very little amounts of nuclear material. In the documentary “Pandora’s Promise” Leonard Koch(died on the fifteenth of may in 2015) said that “one pound of uranium, which is about the size of my fingertip, would produce the same amount of energy as five thousand barrels of oil.” Now in one forty-two gallon barrel of oil there is five point eight million btu(british thermal units), one btu would raise a pot of water one degree. Multiply five point eight million by five thousand, and you get
…show more content…
An article on radioactive waste has stated that “Breeders offer a virtually inexhaustible source of energy…. With breeders, the amount of plutonium stays in principle constant, because the fuel is regenerated.” What this means is that the reactor uses neutrons to split the plutonium, which then creates more nuclear material to use as energy, and produces no waste. In the documentary “Pandora’s Promise” Leonard Koch said “Breeder reactor work by creating heat, and once the heat is created, it turns into steam and from that point on it’s just like any other source of energy.” This only strengthens the fact that the energy source is …show more content…
The second piece of evidence I used was that the energy source is clean and is seemingly infinite, the use of the breeder reactor is what makes nuclear one of the most clean and infinite energy sources that we can use. The last piece of evidence that I provided in favor of the energy source is that it is safe, IFR reactors are the safest form of nuclear energy in the world because they can not meltdown, and there have been the least human deaths in nuclear energy

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Nuclear power has a lot of benefits, especially towards the environment. For example, in Document A, it states that “nuclear power production releases no pollutants into the air.” Meaning that while the nuclear power plant is giving out energy for us, it’s not harming the environment. This is important because since it's not releasing any air pollutants, then its not releasing any greenhouse gasses, the earth’s temperature is going to decrease. It's a win win for both the humanity and Earth.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of TMI

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuclear power has many positives to using them over any other type of power. An example of this is a reliable energy source because it can operate 24/7 for 18-24 months and it stops so the workers can refuel it. Another reason is this type of power does not release anything into the air and helps fight global warming because the power plants have avoided 64 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases. There's only been three major accidents produces less radioactive material than coal plants. Those are just some of the reasons why it is better than other types of power.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though utilizing nuclear fission as a power source does have its respectable pros, the cons seem to overwhelm the pros. Setting up nuclear power plants is very expensive and the majority of nuclear power plants’ fuel relies on a very meager source. The other cons include and are not limited to: mining for the meager source poses a health risk to the people mining and not mining and if not dealt with properly, the radioactive materials used in a nuclear power plant can severely harm the environment as well as the people and animals within it. Opposed to other nonrenewable resources like coal, petroleum, and natural gas, nuclear power plants emits little to no amount of pollution/greenhouse gases into the air. In addition, they are cheap to run.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The problem is that why do we think nuclear power is good? And why not use wood or coal or something other that nuclear power. Science has identified this issue when they monitored how much resources we use and we have to understand how we won’t run out of resources. This issue affects us because one day we will run out of resources such as coal gas or oil and it will lead to a difficult like which will affect human population. Uranium has several uses and one of them is to power a nuclear power plant.…

    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fossil fuel power and Nuclear power plants both give out an enormous amount of energy. But both of them have equal positives and negatives. Nuclear Reactors produce waste products that damage our natural environment. Fossil Fuels also damage our natural environment through air pollution. Fossil fuels are also on their path to extinction so this could mean that more people start relying on Nuclear Reactors…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The type of uranium fuel used in the process of fission is “virtually inexhaustible”. Current figures suggest we have 670 years of identified uranium sources left. But in reality there is actually an infinite supply; the element can be obtained via phosphate ores and conventional resources. * It can even be recycled and reused to make…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This article presents the pros and cons of nuclear power. Nuclear power could be the ideal power source for most people. Nuclear power is considered clean because it has low Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The main advantages of nuclear power are it is reliable, powerful and effective as well as being cheap, which is a bonus. Advancement in technologies has made it a more viable option than other power sources.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yucca Nuclear Energy

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It has been proven by years of practice and research to be a safe and efficient source of energy. There are geological repositories that with the cooperation of congress and state official can be a long term option for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel. It is a substantially more environmentally friendly than the burning of fossil fuels and comes with a very nominal price to our environment. Alternative energy sources have many drawbacks and are far less economically sound energy sources to invest in. In conclusion I hope to one day see a united states no longer so substantially dependent on fossil fuels but instead able to fulfill these energy needs through the continuation and expansion of the nuclear energy…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear power comprises 20% of the world’s energy production. No other form of energy production runs the risk of being taken over by terrorists, or exploding and killing millions of people within a 50 mile radius (Nuclear Power Plants). The United States has 121 government sanctioned nuclear energy power plants in its borders that each cost extreme amounts to build and run. With the U.S. being nearly twenty trillion dollars in debt, it would be wise to stop all further development of nuclear energy.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In that conclusion nuclear energy is safe in the long run due to less air pollution then other resources for…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States government should increase regulations on nuclear power and we as a society should leave this dangerous form of energy in the past because of possible future disasters, the multiple dangers posed to the…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear fission is the process of one atom splitting into two and releasing energy (Brian & Lamb, 2000). Nuclear power plant operators need to turn the nuclear fission into electrical energy. To do this, the operators control the energy that is given off by the enriched uranium, which allows it to heat…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, fission reaction produces heat easily because of the enormous amount of released energy result of nuclear process. As soon as the nuclear reaction happens, the water in the reactor begins to boil and generate vapor which moves the turbines to produce cheap electricity. In addition, most reactors developed in this century are molten-salt reactors which are significantly efficient since they have a reduced size that allows an easy elimination of waste materials. Also, such reactors lend themselves to factory manufacture, reducing their cost. Furthermore, taking advantage of the endless fission process, nuclear plants are the most reliable source of electricity, operating full time for 18 to 24 months before shutting down for a short time in order to refuel.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays