It was due to the threat of India that led Pakistani leaders to take military assistance from US army. Since the inception of Pakistan, the economic and political ties observed between the two countries. Also in 1950, instead Liaqat Ali Khan would visit Moscow is turned down and choose to visit the United States. Since then Pakistan has played the role of a close ally of the US. The military assistance of about $508 million given to Pakistan by the US. Pakistani military at this time was lucky to maintain stable strategic position. In comparison to 1950 where an extreme political disturbance observed. As around seven Pakistani prime ministers’ downfall is seen from 1951 to 1958 (Thomas, 2013). During this period, Pakistan
…show more content…
Since India had suffered a loss at the hands of China, it seemed a good idea to strike the enemy while having a good solid chance. Therefore, Pakistan sent its troop to win over Kashmir. The battle took about 17 days in which India maintained its defense by sending its very common and not trained soldiers. The reason behind that was the confusion that took, place in the air support and the ground forces. The two forces were unable to communicate properly and as a result had to fake a loss against the rival country. In 1969, both these States ordered its troops returned to their original positions. During the conflict, the US halted aid to both India and Pakistan (Khan, 2014). During 1969, the adverse conditions caused by the single men rule resulted in chaos. Ayub Khan had to resign in 97, but the martial law had already imposed. As a result, General Agha Muhammad Yahya posted as CMLA later the president. During 2001 the 9/11 incident, Musharraf took over acquiesced to the demands of us and worse for being part of the global war on terror. As a result, our aid is again resumed later, and other forces started operations against Al Qaeda. Their relationship between the two states was not …show more content…
Numerous units were placed and since balance was achieved as more than enough artillery rounds made available by during that period, it is unable to, say whether each unit had its artillery. For example, only one artillery provided to the six armored divisions against India, in the sector of Sialkot. Therefore, such situations were common at that time, which of course, was a negative situation for the country. The scarcity of weapons is, not always the solution, but we may say that India had an advantage over Pakistan did not have a well-created army and defense system. They had to recreate it all from scratch, in the case of India, they had the proper setup of the military, weapons, artillery, air force, etc. They did not have to start from the initial stage. By end 1965, the number of units has been just about 40 i.e. 40 Field Regiment where the Indians had left their 25 Pounders intact before fleeing the
Since India had suffered a loss at the hands of China, it seemed a good idea to strike the enemy while having a good solid chance. Therefore, Pakistan sent its troop to win over Kashmir. The battle took about 17 days in which India maintained its defense by sending its very common and not trained soldiers. The reason behind that was the confusion that took, place in the air support and the ground forces. The two forces were unable to communicate properly and as a result had to fake a loss against the rival country. In 1969, both these States ordered its troops returned to their original positions. During the conflict, the US halted aid to both India and Pakistan (Khan, 2014). During 1969, the adverse conditions caused by the single men rule resulted in chaos. Ayub Khan had to resign in 97, but the martial law had already imposed. As a result, General Agha Muhammad Yahya posted as CMLA later the president. During 2001 the 9/11 incident, Musharraf took over acquiesced to the demands of us and worse for being part of the global war on terror. As a result, our aid is again resumed later, and other forces started operations against Al Qaeda. Their relationship between the two states was not …show more content…
Numerous units were placed and since balance was achieved as more than enough artillery rounds made available by during that period, it is unable to, say whether each unit had its artillery. For example, only one artillery provided to the six armored divisions against India, in the sector of Sialkot. Therefore, such situations were common at that time, which of course, was a negative situation for the country. The scarcity of weapons is, not always the solution, but we may say that India had an advantage over Pakistan did not have a well-created army and defense system. They had to recreate it all from scratch, in the case of India, they had the proper setup of the military, weapons, artillery, air force, etc. They did not have to start from the initial stage. By end 1965, the number of units has been just about 40 i.e. 40 Field Regiment where the Indians had left their 25 Pounders intact before fleeing the