The Phenomenon: A Brief Summary Of Abortion By Thomson

Great Essays
Abortion:
Thomson presents his analogy by first introducing a “famous” violinist who for one reason or another is terminal ill. The Society of Music Lovers, after scouring all the available medical records, find that I (you) alone have the right blood type to aid him. Without further discussion the Society of Music Lovers proceeds to kidnap me (you) and connects the famous violinist’s circulatory system to that of my own. Upon awaking I become aware that I have indeed been plugged into another human being and to unplug myself from him would be murderous, unless I wait nine months. Furthermore, he explains that although it would be a great kindness to stay attached with the violinist, we are not morally obligated to do so. Thomson’s analogy
…show more content…
. . Thus, the misfortune of premature death consists of the loss to us pf the future goods of consciousness” (Introducing Ethics, p. 402). Premature death, according to Marquis, prevents us from having a “natural death”; this in turn depriving us of experiences we would have experienced. Marquis then concludes that an abortion deprives the fetus a future like ours, or what he calls “FLO”. Because of this Marquis believes that abortions are seriously immoral. Marquis talks about valuable futures in his paper and uses it later to introduce the concept of FLO. The problem I have with this is statement is that fetuses don’t know they have a valuable future, fetus’ have no cognitive thinking. I would have to disagree with Marquis on the basis of his definition of valuable …show more content…
Bedau concludes, “A punishment can be an effective deterrent only of if it is consistently and promptly employed. Capital punishment cannot be administered to meet these conditions” (Introducing Ethics, p. 601). In theory this makes sense, but the problem I have with this argument is that a lot of criminals don’t think about the consequences, but rather on the mental/physical high or the payout. Bedau continues to advocate against corporal punishment by stating, “If, however, severe punishment can deter crime, then long-term imprisonment is severe enough to deter any rational person from committing a violent crime” (Introducing Ethics, p. 602). This, like the earlier argument, is sound; however, to deter that of the most violent crimes is very difficult to do. A lot of criminals are away of the severity of the crimes they are committing, the problem is that they don’t care and/or they think they won’t get

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives. The child 's mother whom is having the abortion does not know if that baby will make a change in the future, the possibilities are endless. First take a look at Marquis argument of why abortion is immortal. Marquis argument is that any living thing; human or animal, has their future taken away. He starts of the essay…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant On Abortion

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Abortion is stopping a beating heart, which is considered murder and murder is never a moral action. According to the deontology theory, it is wrong to take a life of a human being and abortion is doing just that. This is another reason why abortion is immoral and irrational. These are the moral and ethical arguments of a deontologist on abortion. One’s duty to provide for a child that they created should be enough reason for abortion to be immoral.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A famous philosopher, Don Marquis, who is against abortion, also agrees with me on the topic of abortion depriving the future of the fetus. In his essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral”, he argues that abortion is taking away any future a fetus will have no matter good or bad. In this essay, he also explains how abortion has a greater effect on the fetus because it is the one who is dying. All aspects of that fetus’ future have been taken from him or her. In the quote below, Marquis further explains how the killing of the fetus affects the fetus more so than those who are around the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Conception is the first step in the process of pregnancy, which is reproducing and having a child. Abortion is removing the egg, therefore eliminating any chance of the embryo developing further, ultimately ending the life of the child. Because abortion is killing a child, the process is breaking the 6th commandment, proving the Bible does defend the unborn child. The personal choice to commit to an abortion is alway tied to an emotional barrier. For anti-abortionists, they find the decision difficult and taxing emotionally after the fact, realizing the life of a child that could be running around some day.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why is fetus not a baby? Don Marquis sets out to prove once and for all that abortion is seriously wrong. However, in certain cases such as the form of a pregnancy that could endanger the mother’s life when the fetus is anencephalic, it can be permitted. In his argument, Marquis claims that abortion is wrong because it is wrong to kill a hermit and the loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences that would have established one’s future. I shall argue that although these claims seem to be successful, they still have errors.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Callahan feels that the law misleads the patient to feel they have autonomy thinking that the active euthanasia will help them reach the good life. The third point put pressure of the medical professional to achieve what the patient thinks is the good life. This point makes a patient think, escaping from personal life that is causing suffering instead of the pain from the sick of the body. Callahan feels that active euthanasia has no justifiable reason on why it would be right to legalize killing one another. Callahan objects to Rachels and Brock’s arguments for euthanasia.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/‘future like ours’. Therefore, abortion is not morally permissible.” Author’s Name Institution’ Name “Killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/‘future like ours’. Therefore, abortion is not morally permissible.” In the media, we often read about or hear about pro-life and pro-choice abortion arguments. Considering the argument is inherently about life and death, it makes abortion one of the most controversial issues to date. In 1971, Judith Jarvis Thomson published a moral philosophy paper by the name “A defense of Abortion.” In her paper, Thomson states that a human embryo, even though an undeveloped person, has a right to life.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This analogy is challenging the more extreme view held by those in opposition to abortion. This view finds abortion “impermissible even to save the mother’s life.” Imagine a woman has become pregnant and in the same day learns of a newly developed heart disease that will kill her if she carries her baby to term. The baby has a right to life, but so does the woman. Thomson brings up the argument most familiar. “Performing the abortion would be directly killing the child, whereas doing nothing would not be killing the mother, but letting her die.” The conclusion that is drawn from this scenario is that your own right to life gives you the moral right to “unplug” yourself if your life is threatened.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Satire On Abortion

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    People these days take advantage of abortion and chose to abuse it and use it as a birth control. Abortion is a “war against the unborn” and should be illegal everywhere unless a life threatening matter occurs. Here I wrote why abortion should be illegal. 93% of 4.3 million abortions take place because of personal not medical reasons, either the child is considered to be unwanted or inconvenient to social, professional, or academic priorities. People argue that if a woman takes the risk of getting pregnant, and…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays