Code Of Hammurabi And Gilgamesh Comparison Essay

In this excerpt, I will be comparing two primarily documents namely the epic of Gilgamesh and Code of Hammurabi. I have chosen these documents for the insight they give us about Mesopotamia civilazation;the world’s first civliztion.The epic of Gilgamesh was written around 2000B.C.E and perfectly gives us details about the society at that time. Code of Hammurabi was also written around 1754B.C.E. They are historically significant as they are the rigins of civilization that shaped the sociert and civilization hat come after them,These two documents have many similarities and differences in different areas. They have similarities in that they are both written documents of the ancient world. Both documents were one of the world’s first written documents, code of Hammurabi being the frst written law .Both documents show disdain for females, kings claim power from God, show us …show more content…
It is historical very significant in helping us understand the relationship between a king and the people in the ancient time. It also gives us insight about peoples understanding in creation OF humnbeings. The code of Hammuurabi and epic of Gilgamesh are similar in the way they treat their kings .The Story begins with praising Gilgamesh saying “.. this was the king who knew countries of the world. He was wise ,he saw mysteries and knew secret things….”. This speech tells us that kings were thought to be and expected to be supernatural beings who know better than the common people. The word “he knew countries of the world” also tells us that ancient Mesopotamians were interested in geography and exploration and kings were the leaders of such exploration and discoveries. The beginning of the code of Hammurabi also starts with saying “..[the gods] made him[hammurabi] great …supreme in the world..” proving us that after 300 years the sumerians still believed that kings were appointed by