Tiger shark, one of the most commonly seen species in the area, can serve as an example since they are not only defined as creatures on the top of the food chain but also on the front places of the fishermen’s hunting lists. The tiger shark has the widest food range of all sharks, consuming a large variety of prey: seals, birds, turtles, and even other small reef sharks. In the journal Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean, it includes that “recent studies in the Great Barrier Reef, where tiger shark populations have declined but green turtles have begun to recover and sea grass has started to decrease, suggest indirect effects of sharks on sea grass” (Ferretti, Worm, Britten, Michael, Lotze 1067). The connections among the three marine species mentioned above are clear: tiger sharks prey upon green turtles while green turtles consume green grass. When the size of tiger sharks shrinks, green turtles, labeled to be endangered species as indicated in the previous paragraphs, are in lower predation pressure so that the likeliness for them to give up foraging opportunities for safety enhancement is less, creating a better condition for green turtles to recover. As the number of green turtles expands, more green grass is eaten up as a result, leading to reduction in green grass. This example shows that overfishing top-ranked species can in the end influence the autotrophs that lie in the base of the food chain. What’s more, the cascading effects of changes in the ecosystem can be better illustrated in the case of the cownose ray. According to a scientific journal called Cascading Effects of the Loss of Apex Predatory Sharks from a Coastal Ocean, “from 1970-2005...shark population in the Great Barrier Reef may have declined by more than 97 percent” (Myers, Baum, Shepherd, Powers, and Peterson 1848). That
Tiger shark, one of the most commonly seen species in the area, can serve as an example since they are not only defined as creatures on the top of the food chain but also on the front places of the fishermen’s hunting lists. The tiger shark has the widest food range of all sharks, consuming a large variety of prey: seals, birds, turtles, and even other small reef sharks. In the journal Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean, it includes that “recent studies in the Great Barrier Reef, where tiger shark populations have declined but green turtles have begun to recover and sea grass has started to decrease, suggest indirect effects of sharks on sea grass” (Ferretti, Worm, Britten, Michael, Lotze 1067). The connections among the three marine species mentioned above are clear: tiger sharks prey upon green turtles while green turtles consume green grass. When the size of tiger sharks shrinks, green turtles, labeled to be endangered species as indicated in the previous paragraphs, are in lower predation pressure so that the likeliness for them to give up foraging opportunities for safety enhancement is less, creating a better condition for green turtles to recover. As the number of green turtles expands, more green grass is eaten up as a result, leading to reduction in green grass. This example shows that overfishing top-ranked species can in the end influence the autotrophs that lie in the base of the food chain. What’s more, the cascading effects of changes in the ecosystem can be better illustrated in the case of the cownose ray. According to a scientific journal called Cascading Effects of the Loss of Apex Predatory Sharks from a Coastal Ocean, “from 1970-2005...shark population in the Great Barrier Reef may have declined by more than 97 percent” (Myers, Baum, Shepherd, Powers, and Peterson 1848). That