In Furman V. Georgia, the court issued its most significant ruling regarding the death penalty. Rather than focus on the physical and emotional pain of the prisoner as the grounds for capital punishment to be considered cruel and unusable, Furman 's defense argued that the death penalty was arbitrary and capricious. This argument presented evidence that a person convicted of a capital punishment may or may not be executed because the law and the state courts did not systematically apply the death penalty. But in 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court issued another landmark decision in Gregg V. Georgia, which required bifurcated trail structure. This required that trails for capital offenses had to be conducted in two separate parts. The first part of the trail, the jury determines the guilt of the defendant. And in the second part, after the defendant has been convicted, additional evidence can be an be introduced relevant to the punishment appropriate for the
In Furman V. Georgia, the court issued its most significant ruling regarding the death penalty. Rather than focus on the physical and emotional pain of the prisoner as the grounds for capital punishment to be considered cruel and unusable, Furman 's defense argued that the death penalty was arbitrary and capricious. This argument presented evidence that a person convicted of a capital punishment may or may not be executed because the law and the state courts did not systematically apply the death penalty. But in 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court issued another landmark decision in Gregg V. Georgia, which required bifurcated trail structure. This required that trails for capital offenses had to be conducted in two separate parts. The first part of the trail, the jury determines the guilt of the defendant. And in the second part, after the defendant has been convicted, additional evidence can be an be introduced relevant to the punishment appropriate for the