This applies to Moore’s argument due to language having either a positive or negative tone on the topic of race or ethnicity. Moore describes language as “a reflection of society's attitude and thoughts.” where language can illustrate their looks on race in a negative luster or a positive luster when it comes to white supremacy. In addition, they show how individuals are persuaded to act a certain way towards the minority due to the power of language. For example: Adolf Hitler convinced the majority of Germany to turn on Jewish worshipers by using words such as “vermin” or “jew pig” to emit a negative connotation on Jewish …show more content…
The greatest weakness in her argument is the expression to change the way we discipline our children. Many individuals were raised to believe men are more superior and that's just how society goes. In fact, it is very difficult to raise children very differently on how the parents were raised. No matter how much Adichie wants this, we can't get everyone to change the way parents raise their children. Adichie has given this very little thought on how to change society to favor men and women equally. However, this is a very compelling conclusion in multiple ways. The speaker describes the importance of culture. In culture, women are supposed to low-ranking to men. However, individuals can change culture. She says “Culture doesn’t make people, people make culture.” She also tells a personal story of her two twin nieces. She describes that if her nieces were born one-hundred years ago, they would be killed. She describes this in order to lay a foundation on how culture changes in multiple ways, and how it still