The final theme is, there are no definitive data that support either the use or nonuse of out-of-level testing with students with disabilities. The first study that focused on students with disabilities considered how to test students who are identified as educably mentally retarded. The usefulness of out-of-level testing was determined by reporting on the resulting test item statistics. The findings suggested that the students with disabilities did not obtain lower internal consistency reliability coefficients when compared to standardized samples of the test. This author concluded that the teacher selection method of testing students with disabilities out-of-level with standardized measures is appropriate for selecting reliable testing instruments. Another study that was conducted was with 75 sixth grade special education students. The study showed that the test scores dropped when converted back to in-level …show more content…
This study gave me the opportunity to see how the definition changed over time and how it was looked at by teachers and administration. I would say that I have to agree with the three themes that are given in the last section. I believe that students who get frustrated tend to guess more or quit taking the test. I believe that out-of-level has benefits for the students who take them. But only when they are one year above or below. If they are more than one year then there is more harm than good for the students. I agree with the way the tests are created to the appropriate difficulty and achievement level. This could help the student achieve better grades and show their understanding of the content being taught to them. If there are students with disabilities it is important to make sure that the out-of-level testing is accurate for them. The goal is to make sure that the students are taking a test that is not too difficult for them, but it able to ask questions that they are able to understand in order to