Our Friend Epicurus Research Paper

Superior Essays
Our Friend, Epicurus
Epicurus was a philosopher during the Hellenistic era whose primary focus was to understand how exactly to live a good life. To Epicurus, a good life was equivalent to a happy life. Epicurus founded a school outside of Athens which he called “The Garden”. This school was isolated from the rest of society and built in a rural area. Here his followers grew their own food and lived simply. It was a place where his people lived together in peace and acceptance. He taught his friends to understand the meaning of true happiness and guided them into living in accordance with his teachings so that they could experience self-sufficiency and pleasure in their lives.
Epicurus realized that the average person experienced many fears and anxieties throughout their lifetimes. He knew that these fears were preventing people from living the good life. He recognized that where fear existed, there was always a desire for pleasure. He also understood that when people felt good, they had no further desire for pleasure because it was already being satisfied. From this information, he gathered that the pleasurable state is our most natural state and so therefore we should do all that we can to eliminate fear and pain.
Epicurus taught his followers that to live the happy life, they had to focus on the desires that are both natural and necessary. Natural
…show more content…
Though luxuries from the natural and unnecessary category are enjoyable, I see in myself the effect of constant stress that desire brings. Simply to focus on the practice of living each moment with as little desire as possible brings great rewards. I am reminded of Epicurus’s Final Words in The Letter to Menoeceus (p.235). Epicurus writes to Menoeceus to meditate on the precepts of his letter. He says: “Then never, either awake or asleep, will you be dismayed; but you will live like a god among

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the you tube clip, the narrator, Alain de Botton, described that the “good life” was the result of friendship, freedom, and diminishing one’s worries. He described a satisfied life was a basic and simple way of life. There were no commitments desiring fabulous or erotic customs or materialistic items which would suggest that an individual is doing rather well in with oneself or their environment. In Epicurus’ world the cluster of society’s greed could not fulfil an individual’s endearment, but the basic human instincts would yield a fortitude or collection of fulfilment or satisfaction. The body only needs what is necessary, or the bare essentials, to work itself through the attainment for having a satisfying life.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Rid yourself of false beliefs” is an appropriate characterization of Epicureanism for the following reasons. Epicurus like Aristotle believed that the highest good is happiness however unlike Aristotle he believed that the path to happiness is pleasure. The main reason Epicurus associated happiness with pleasure is because people do everything for their own sake or their own pleasure. Everything we do in life is for our own pleasure. This can clearly be seen in infants.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stoicism’s definition of the true happiness is self-contained and defines happiness as a state that not dependent on any external circumstances. In this Greek philosophy, Nature can make people rational, and people should use reason to improve themselves. Meanwhile, the Epictetus teaches us: “Do not wish to be thought to know anything” (Epictetus par.13), and “Never call yourself a philosopher, nor talk a great deal among the unlearned about theorems, but act conformably to them” (Epictetus par. 46). Stoicism’s goal is to control ourselves, and it also teaches us to control our arrogance. When people free from not only external surroundings but also the inner desire for pleasure and even pain, everyone can finally gain the true happiness.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stoic view that one must endure pain, or transcend pain to gain pleasure lines up with the belief that is held today. For instance, the saying “no pain no gain,” states exactly what Cicero and Stoics believe. Furthermore, there is the belief that nothing good comes easy, so if you want something good you must be willing to endure pain and turmoil for a while to come out on the other side. Cicero’s two arguments about the wise man and the need for total self-control to gain happiness explains why both are an outcome of virtue, and why without virtue no one can truly live a happy life. Living a simple life through virtues is thus a happy life because with the total self-control and virtues such as justice and prudence, a wise man will find the joy in the meager of things, while being able to live a happy life no matter the torment or turmoil that may befall on…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Epictetus Research Paper

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stephen Taylor Humanities Epictetus. Enchiridion. Dover Publications, 2004 28 September 2014 The philosopher Epictetus was born ca. 50 A.D. in southwest Turkey.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that death annihilates identity and identity ends when the body ends. Human are necessarily mortal; even if they’re put back together after death, it would not be the same because the only thing that makes an individual themselves is the unity of the identity and body. When the connection of these two break, there is no putting them back together. Epicurus has the notion that “good and bad consists of sense-experience” (164). Death is the annihilation of those experiences.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In philosophy there are many stands to take when it comes to a view of topic shared and discovered by many. Specifically, there are three philosophers that have differing ideas on the role of pleasure in morality, Aristotle, Kant, and Mill. They share and clarify their positions through a plethora of titles and information that will help a reader gain a better understanding of the role of pleasure in morality. Though each philosopher has their own share of ideas of what the highest good represents, they all believe in morality being the search for the highest good. Aristotle begins with his description of happiness as fulfillment of all desires, in accordance with compliance of virtue.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since sensations are universal across different humans, his implies that humans’ thoughts and reasons are also universal. However, this poses a problem when it comes to creating original ideas and approaching situations creatively. For example, if we assume the opposite of Epicurus’ argument, that thoughts are not just a set of sensations, we can see that different people can think differently about certain situations. This is true in the real world because even though food causes the same sensation in our body (i.e. filling an empty stomach, providing energy), our thoughts about certain types of foods can differ (whether they are pleasant or unpleasant).…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    So, according to Epicurus, religion only instills fear and pain obstructing them of happiness. In broad sense, Epicurus was a hedonist. He believed that the pleasure is the highest good. But Epicurean hedonism was a little different than just vulgar hedonism.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory implies the fact that happiness can be achieved through multiple aspects of life and that each new situation has the opportunity to either enhance or diminish a person’s happiness levels rather than Aristotle’s view that happiness either exists or it doesn’t. Epictetus stresses that things in the world do not have the power to disturb humanity but rather the judgements that are placed on these things do. Happiness mainly stems from how easily people can recognize what is under their control as well as how they react to situations that they can encounter. Unlike Aristotle’s theory, Epictetus’ view on happiness seems to be one that most people can easily attain happiness as the highest good with. This is because Epictetus is correct in his statement…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, it can be argued that while Aristotle believes that happiness lied within fulfilling the desires of human nature, being in accordance with understanding the humanly existence and not denying what is needed by it; point of Epicurus seems to be more random since it is enough for him to call himself happy in any situation where pain and fear are absent but pleasure is present. In order to further differentiate the different understanding of happiness of Aristotle and Epicurus, the trial of Socrates may establish a solid foundation. In Apology, the trial of Socrates is narrated. When Socrates is charged by being heretic to gods and misleads the young people to criminal acts, Socrates is given the chance of determining his own punishment; exile or death.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers such as Aristotle, The Buddha, and the more modern-day Nel Noddings have all begged the question, “What does it mean to live a good life?” Aristotle’s main view aims at happiness, and focus on the self. The Buddha and Nel Noddings both believe that one should not fully focus on the self, but more on the selfless acts for others. Each of these philosophers has determined their own proper way to lead a good life and I will examine each philosophy through comparison to the eldest, Aristotle. I believe Aristotle’s philosophy to be agreeable, but I feel he is missing certain key components which I will discuss by the end of the essay.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the Good Life? Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle are known as great men of thought and, though they didn’t start philosophy, they are pioneers of that field and some of their thoughts are still used today. While some of the philosopher’s opinions and viewpoints are very different form each other they all end up focusing on one question, “What is the good life?” Even though they don’t see eye to eye on quite a few things they still agree that the good life is the ultimate goal that all men strive for.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every single person has a different standpoint of what is important to make his or her life a good and happy life, and everyone has the control to make that life possible. Aristotle believed the good life is one which thrives and that individuals live happily and opportunely. Socrates was another philosopher that contributed in the argument on the good life and how it should be achieved. According to Socrates, the good life is one that is not materialistic but rather about the mind of an individual. He argued that an individual with a healthy mind tends to live the good life as compared to that who is wealthy.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays