Two articles have been selected for analysis on the death operation of Osama Bin Laden being held in Abbottabad, Pakistan. One has been written by an American writer revealing their ideology and reasoning over the operation. The other has been comprised of the reactions of Pakistanis whose land was used without giving any information beforehand and without taking any permission to attack for operation. The second article thus reflects the ideology and the emotions of Pakistanis over the matter. Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden was the founder of the militant Islamist organization Al-Qaeda, the jihadist organization which is considered responsible for the September 11 attacks on the United States and numerous other mass-casualty attacks
…show more content…
She has given other American’s points of view on the operation objectively but unconsciously and implicitly has shown the American ideology and stance about the operation. She has enriched the death of the enemy by giving the points of views of Obama and different Senators on death. She has used the word America and Americans to give objectivity but unconsciously, she has stated American as “us” and terrorists and allies of Osama as “other”. Obama and other senators, in the article, have clearly put boundaries between Americans as “us” and terrorists and their allies as “other”. They consider “others” inferior to themselves against whom they can use power to eliminate them in any way and this use of power is not bloodshed and killing for them. They can use power to enter any land to act upon their goals without even legal permission and that is why they have not even mentioned their illegal entrance and operation in Pakistan and enriched it as an enormous victory. On the other hand, this illegal entrance issue is the prime contrast with Americans in the Pakistani …show more content…
The writer objectively gives reactions by other people but unconsciously reflects the same stance and ideology presented by the people he has mentioned in the article. The people and the writer are not favouring terrorists or showing any grief on the murder of Bin Laden. They have basically reacted against the illegal entrance of American forces in Pakistan. America has shown a sign of power that it can do anything in any territory according to its will. Some people reacted that this is not the proper way to act upon anything without legal permission which could result in Americans paving their ways to attack Pakistan and some even doubt the authenticity of the operation that the whole operation was a drama for some secret gains. The writer and the people in the article have assigned themselves the status of “us” and shown Americans as “other”. Americans are others who have intruded their land and administration. The main contrast between Pakistanis and Americans in these articles is based upon the nature of
She has given other American’s points of view on the operation objectively but unconsciously and implicitly has shown the American ideology and stance about the operation. She has enriched the death of the enemy by giving the points of views of Obama and different Senators on death. She has used the word America and Americans to give objectivity but unconsciously, she has stated American as “us” and terrorists and allies of Osama as “other”. Obama and other senators, in the article, have clearly put boundaries between Americans as “us” and terrorists and their allies as “other”. They consider “others” inferior to themselves against whom they can use power to eliminate them in any way and this use of power is not bloodshed and killing for them. They can use power to enter any land to act upon their goals without even legal permission and that is why they have not even mentioned their illegal entrance and operation in Pakistan and enriched it as an enormous victory. On the other hand, this illegal entrance issue is the prime contrast with Americans in the Pakistani …show more content…
The writer objectively gives reactions by other people but unconsciously reflects the same stance and ideology presented by the people he has mentioned in the article. The people and the writer are not favouring terrorists or showing any grief on the murder of Bin Laden. They have basically reacted against the illegal entrance of American forces in Pakistan. America has shown a sign of power that it can do anything in any territory according to its will. Some people reacted that this is not the proper way to act upon anything without legal permission which could result in Americans paving their ways to attack Pakistan and some even doubt the authenticity of the operation that the whole operation was a drama for some secret gains. The writer and the people in the article have assigned themselves the status of “us” and shown Americans as “other”. Americans are others who have intruded their land and administration. The main contrast between Pakistanis and Americans in these articles is based upon the nature of