In the short video about activist (Breyer) vs. originalist (Scalia), I learned about the empty bottle, the purpose and consequence, the constitution as the living document, and the decision on the problem. In my opinion, the activist is more liberal because the constitution depends on the nowadays situation. However, the originalist is more conservative since it wants to keep the point that was written by the author. On the purpose and the consequence, Scalia argued that all of the tools should be used in the constitution, and the purpose and consequences needed to be prioritized. Nevertheless, Scalia argued that the limitation was needed on the tools because no one wanted to take risk in the situation that they faced. According to the statement
