A well defined organisational structure is vital to avoid any challenges regarding responsibilities and accountability (Corkindale 2011). Tooker’s approach towards organisational …show more content…
Tooker’s leadership was described as being very task-oriented and achievement-driven. Tooker’s leadership was a mix of an autocratic leader and a democratic leader. He held a high amount of concern for his employees but that did not excuse his immense regard for organisational work. He had a very clear vision for RENCARE and he made sure that everyone in his administration had the same vision and goals in mind. But his leadership was often described as being very aggressive and challenging to cope up with. There was a split of opinion about Tooker’s leadership strategies. Some employees thought that he was an excellent leader who knew how to push his employees to achieve results. Others felt that he was too demanding and he set too high standards for himself and the company which were sometimes, simply not …show more content…
Tooker was a transformational leader and he was very influential and charismatic. Steve was also a spiritual leader, one who motivates his employees through a vision, hope and meaningful involvement (Aydin & Ceylan 2009) His employees sensed that a new style of leader would arise for them to follow and look upon. This created an over-dependency on Tooker for guidance and support. His employees blindly trusted his policies and strategies. This allowed Tooker to control his human resources to the extent they had not seen before. He was able to fully motivate his employees to achieve extraordinary feats. He enabled the employees to grow in their respective field and develop their skills so they may do their job more effectively and