Organ Allocation Involves Ethical Decision Making Essay

Superior Essays
Organ allocation involves ethical decision-making. When making an ethical decision all biases and individuality must be withheld from criteria to make a decision that is objective. The process can be very challenging for individuals with the responsibility of making those decisions. Every effort must be made to uphold the ethical principles set by the ethics board. The purpose of this paper is to explore the ethical decision-making process of organ allocation and give the reader an insight into the challenges faced with making ethical life sustaining choices.
Criteria must be met to be placed on a waiting list for organ transplantation. A physician will give a patient a referral to a transplant hospital. The patient will choose a hospital based on individual needs. An appointment with a transplant team will determine whether the patient is a good candidate for organ transplant based on that hospital’s criteria ("What Factors ," n.d.) Two individuals that have been put on a wait list for cardiac transplantation will be discussed to show the importance of ethical decision making for organ allocation. Mr. Rodriquez is a 33-year-old man currently serving a 15-year sentence for robbery. He will be eligible for parole in five years and has been a model prisoner. He previously served 18 months for burglary
…show more content…
Justice requires equal respect to each patient, but not necessarily treating them the same way. Priority is given to the sickest patient even if the other patient who is not as sick would have a better outcome. Principles of justice are medical urgency, finding another organ in the future, how long a person has been on the waiting list, if this is a first transplant, age, and how close a patient lives to the organ ("Ethical Principles," 2015). If justice was the only principle to consider then Mr. Smith would be the choice due to the significance of his medical

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    He discusses the ”opt-out” organ donation system, a much more controversial way of bringing up the donation rate. However, despite the associated strife with this system, it has proven to…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Simmons Case

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Principle of Justice is based on equality and fairness regardless of race. When choosing to donate, it would not be fair to choose a group of people to help. Sickness, diseases, or accidents are not discriminatory, and the need for help is not limited to certain races. In modern society people are given the choice on whether they want to be an organ donor or not.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For my individual research assignment, the question I must answer is “should the liver allocation system be maximally fair or maximally efficient at producing added years of life from organ transplant?”. The main dilemma is should we give a liver which is a rare and valuable resource to someone far away but won’t survive without it. Or, is it more ethical to give it to someone who is closer but is not in as critical condition. At first glance, I tend to think that everyone should have a fair chance of receiving a liver, and when after reading the prompt for the first time, I tend to think that the liver allocation system should be maximally fair. But, after thinking about it for a while, I find myself leaning more towards maximally efficient.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Countries that currently have an opt-out organ donation policy, have been successful in increasing the number of available organs for transplanting. One reason that the opt-out organ donation policy works is based on the views of the people. For instance, in countries that have on opt-out system it is extraordinary to not donate one’s organs. Where on the other hand, in an opt-in system is is believed to be out of place to donate one’s organs (Rippon 350). This is because people look at what the majority is doing.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kidneys for Sale Miriam Schulman is the assistant director of Markkula Center for Applied Ethics (hereinafter referred to as “Center”). In 1988, the Center posted the article titled “Kidneys for Sale’’ on its website, highlighting the ethics and morality issues surrounding the continued sale of human kidneys for personal profit, which also led to emails from destitute people who wanted specifics on how they could sell their kidneys, which compelled The Center’s Issues group to discuss the pro- ideology and the ethical issues concerning the issues of organ sales. Overall, the article discusses three main considerations about the sales of organs: the morality and ethics of such exchanges; the true shortage of human organs available…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Killing the healthy patient in this transplant case would be an example of a rule that ought not be broken, because most people generally believe that killing an innocent person is intuitively wrong. Although different deontologists make different distinctions on what laws ought not be broken, the general consensus is that not all actions that raise utility level should be…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the shortage of organs available for donation, the criteria to consider a body for donation has changed from “brain death” to “circulatory death”, making organs available sooner. This change in practice has caused ethical dilemmas among the healthcare environment. In a “2006 study found that some perioperative nurses did not accept the irreversibility of cardiac death” (37). A nurse is trained to save lives, and this practice goes against that notion. A nurse must set aside her own personal views and help the family exercise their right to the choices that they…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Controversy for Organ Recipients Even though money should not be the factor in who receives an organ donation to stay alive. If you are poor, do you have the same rights for an organ as the rich? It would seem the recipient awaiting an organ donation, and how they process the lottery system? Should there be exceptions to the rule(s), should the recipient who is an active contributor to society be considered before a person that bleeds society dry? If a person or family donates an organ it should not matter their race or financial situation, who determines?…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Opt-Out Policy

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    From the wealthy clients to the impoverished donors, the black market organ trade has become somewhat of a normalcy to many worldwide. This atrocious, yet prosperous business exists because the supply of organs lag far behind the demand. To alleviate the shortage of healthy organs, America should switch to the “opt-out” policy regarding organ donation. America: the home of bustling cities, unique people, delicious food, and the black market organ trade. Though it doesn’t seem to fit in the list of common concepts associated with America, the black market organ trade has become a profitable enterprise in the USA.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, they might decide someone gets 4 additional entries for organ utility, 2 more for dependability, and 3 taken away for a bad medical history. In the first part of my essay, I will explain why I chose these criteria and argue against other methods of distributing organs. Each of the criteria used to increase/decrease a person’s chances of receiving a transplant are important. Before I explain why I used each factor, keep in mind that I am assuming the information that I use is the only thing we know about the patients. I used organ utility because I feel that someone who can possibly live the longest should get the transplant.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will conclude with another Kantian principle of categorical imperative, which centers on the idea of always preserving life (Kant, p 531). Thus, the surgeon is acting immorally by killing Mr. X for his organs. I do want to further establish this point of categorical imperative as a meeting ground, where the surgeon could perhaps inform Mr. X of the patients who require organs. Mr. X can take it upon himself to perform an act of good will in providing informed consent to allow for transplanting specific organs such as kidneys, which would preserve his life and possibly another of the five…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of medical mistrust in the organ donation community, this mistrust leaves many potential donors, as well as family members of potential donors, unwilling to make the crucial obligation of organ donation. The unwillingness of organ donation in turn leads to the low supply of organs available. When the number of organ donations are low, individuals in need of an organ transplant seek other means of acquiring the lifesaving organs needed in order to survive. The final result is an issue of trust once again. Individuals in need of an organ transplant are seeking lifesaving organs through the black market and putting their lives in the hands of an illegal system that is noted for their exploitation of donors and…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The final decision as to who receives an organ involves adherence to multiple policies. The National Organ Transplant Act • Outlaws the sale of human organs. • Specifies that the OPTN establish medical criteria for organ allocation including compatibility of the donor and the recipient and medical urgency (medical urgency only considered for heart,…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Statistics claim, “Every ten minutes another name is added onto the national organ transplant waiting list” (donatelife.net). In today’s society there is an issue that is often forgotten, and that is organ donation. Many people don’t often think about this problem due to the fact of many distractions such as current events, politics, personal matters, and many more. Although there are many reasons as to why this topic isn’t brought up often, doesn’t mean it should be brushed off the shoulder and set aside. Patients have to face life or death situations due to the lack of organ donations, and there are so many resolutions that can be made towards this issue.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Organ Donation Persuasive Essay Gavin Sauter In an organ donation, when somebody dies, the family of that person has to give permission to donate the organs of that person. There are many reasons as to why the families shouldn’t have a say as to whether or not the organs can be donated. The deceased don’t need their leftover organs for anything, people are in need of certain organs, whether or not they donate their organs shouldn’t be up to their family, and doctors could also find a way to help cure organ diseases or find ways that don’t involve taking them from the deceased.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays